Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 2: Site Plan with Playground Location <br /> .,, j_ _ ____i i <br /> i <br /> , .., .4., same am • • Olik\t) --" T.--r.',:t <br /> i {> •.T FI��•r � L, 4 ._.�.. <br /> 1, A a 1-k, C <br /> O ' 'T;�' T= q <br /> ('.� _ ! <br /> 'Cg • <br /> z <br /> I -" Existing ° \,_o <br /> Nr. oar Budding a t' ' 0 <br /> ---- .. 1 <br /> —1 7 . 4T.-Pure*Pur. church Or . <br /> . r <br /> N \ <br /> c,-,,,1 a <br /> , , <br /> \.\. <br /> „_, <br /> , --,,_ , • <br /> , , -.'r ) <br /> *----(r <br /> 1 _( TRAILS OR1VE <br /> ��..� S.VALLEY <br /> 4 <br /> i <br /> Additional detail on the proposed project is included in Attachment 5, the April 25, 2018 <br /> Planning Commission Agenda Report. <br /> APPEALS FILED <br /> Appeal by Darlene and Michael Miller <br /> On June 29, 2018, Darlene and Michael Miller ("the Millers") filed an appeal. Reasons <br /> for the Millers' appeal are summarized as follows: <br /> 1. Planning Commission's approval violated the conditions of approval originally <br /> placed on this site when it was constructed, in terms of outdoor activities/uses. <br /> 2. Noise impacts from the playground and from events were not properly analyzed, <br /> and the noise will be detrimental to neighbors. <br /> Page 6 of 15 <br />