My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
GHAD
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
051518
>
GHAD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2018 1:18:11 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 1:18:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/15/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to complete erosion repairs along the fire trail within the covered area. Should a <br /> significant event occur, this reserve amount is likely inadequate to cover the cost of <br /> needed repairs. <br /> As noted above, the proposed assessments fund geologic monitoring and related <br /> maintenance services, which provide a special benefit to the properties within the <br /> GHADs that does not benefit the public at-large. In addition, the GHADs were formed by <br /> consent of all original property owners (the developers). Since these criteria have been <br /> satisfied, the GHAD assessments are allowed to be increased by the amount of the <br /> ENR index without being subject to a Prop. 218 vote of existing property owners. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> In previous years, staff held an informational meeting with property owners from the four <br /> GHADs to answer questions and promote a better understanding of the GHADs. These <br /> are some of the issues that were addressed: <br /> a) Residents were concerned whether their assessments were going to <br /> increase. In several previous years, staff was able to advise those residents <br /> that the index for the GHADs provided for no change in the assessment from <br /> the previous year. Last year, a nominal two percent increase was <br /> recommended based upon the ENR index. <br /> b) Residents from the Laurel Creek GHAD commented about the amount of <br /> reserves in their GHAD and wanted to know if there was a cap of the <br /> reserves. Staff explained the Plan of Control for the GHAD anticipates a <br /> major event every 10 years, and since the Laurel Creek CHAD is over 10 <br /> years old and there has not been an event, the reserves have continued to <br /> grow. Staff explained that reserves are like an insurance policy: if a landslide <br /> occurred, funds from the reserves could be immediately available to repair the <br /> landslide. If there were not sufficient funds in the reserves to repair the slide, <br /> some other method of payment for the repairs would be necessary such as <br /> borrowing money or selling bonds. In either case, the property owners within <br /> the GHAD would be responsible for these costs. The City's geotechnical <br /> consultant has stated the cost of repairing a small landslide could cost over <br /> $300,000 and that a large landslide could cost over $1,000,000. Based on <br /> these numbers, staff and the City's consultant have determined that there are <br /> insufficient reserves in the Laurel Creek GHAD. In several years when the <br /> reserves grow larger, the City's consultant can update our current risk <br /> assessment based upon current history of the GHAD and recalculate the <br /> probability of a major event and cost. <br /> c) Residents asked why the reserves were not earning a higher rate of return, <br /> which could then offset the amount of the assessments. Staff explained that <br /> the investment vehicles available to public entities were limited and <br /> conservative, so a high rate of return could not be expected in this low- <br /> interest-rate environment. <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.