11 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton Recycled Water Project CEQA Addendum Table 1 Environmental Review of Proposed Project Changes Environmental Issue Area Where Impact(s) were Analyzed in Prior Environmental Documents. What were the Environmental Impact conclusions for the Original Proposed Project? Do Proposed Changes Involve New Significant or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Circumstances Involving New Significant Impacts or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification? Are Prior Mitigation Measures Sufficient for Addressing Any New Potential Changes or Impacts? Utilities and Service Systems Pages 3-41 through 3-42 LTS No No No Yes IS/MND Discussion: Construction and operation of the Proposed Project would not involve activities that would cause a significant impact to existing utility services. IS/MND Mitigation Measures: • None identified or necessary. Project Change Discussion: The proposed changes to the Proposed would have the same or less impact on utilities and service systems as the Original Proposed Project. The addition of the new booster pump station would not result in any new impacts to utilities as was evaluated in the IS/MND. In fact, the new booster pump station would help improve the recycled water project and irrigation service to the Ken Mercer Sports Park by providing better water pressure. Also, the construction activities associated with the new booster pump station would be substantially the same as they were originally described in the IS/MND. The Revised Proposed Project therefore would not have any incrementally significant effects on utilities and service systems as defined in CEQA Guideline section 15162(a). Mandatory Findings of Significance IS/MND Pages 3-44 and 3-45 LTS/M No No No Yes IS/MND Discussion: With the incorporation of the previously identified mitigation measures, the Proposed Project will not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. Any impacts from the Proposed Project in these areas are considered here to be less -than -significant with the implementation and incorporation of the above mentioned mitigation measures. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, the environmental analysis in this Initial Study was conducted to determine if there were any project -specific effects as a result of the Proposed Project. No direct project -specific significant effects were identified that could not be mitigated to a less -than -significant level. Mitigation Measures incorporated herein mitigate any potential contribution to cumulative (as well as direct) impacts associated with these environmental issues. Therefore, the Proposed Project does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. As a result of mitigation included in this environmental document, the Proposed Project would not result in substantial adverse effects to humans, either directly or indirectly. IS/MND Mitigation Measures: • See previous mitigation measures for each resource category as identified above. Project Change Discussion: The proposed changes to the Proposed would have the same or less impacts the environment and humans as the Original Proposed Project. The addition of the new booster pump station would not result in any new impacts as was evaluated in the IS/MND. Also, the construction activities associated with the booster pump station would be April 2018 3-16