11 - Laserfiche WebLink

City of Pleasanton Recycled Water Project CEQA Addendum Table 1 Environmental Review of Proposed Project Changes Environmental Issue Area Where Impact(s) were Analyzed in Prior Environmental Documents. What were the Environmental Impact conclusions for the Original Proposed Project? Do Proposed Changes Involve New Significant or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Circumstances Involving New Significant Impacts or Substantially More Severe Impacts? Any New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification? Are Prior Mitigation Measures Sufficient for Addressing Any New Potential Changes or Impacts? While, not a specific CEQA resource category, the IS/MND conducted an evaluation on the Proposed Project's potential to have socioeconomic impacts in order to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). As such, the IS/MND concluded that the Proposed Project would not have any socioeconomic impacts. The Proposed Project does not propose any features that would result in disproportionate adverse human health or environmental effects, have any physical effects on minority or low-income populations, and/or alter socioeconomic conditions of populations that reside or work within the City and vicinity. IS/MND Mitigation Measures: • None identified or necessary. Project Change Discussion: The proposed changes to the Proposed would have the same impact on socioeconomics as the Original Proposed Project. The addition of the new booster pump station would not result in any new socioeconomic impacts as was evaluated in the IS/MND. The Proposed Project Change does not propose any features that would result in disproportionate adverse human health or environmental effects, have any physical effects on minority or low- income populations, and/or alter socioeconomic conditions of populations that reside or work within the City and vicinity. Also, the construction activities associated with the new booster pump station would be substantially the same as they were originally described in the IS/MND. The Revised Proposed Project therefore would not have any incrementally significant effects on socioeconomics as defined in CEQA Guideline section 15162(a). Traffic and Transportation IS/MND Pages 3-39 through 3-40 LTS/M No No No Yes IS/MND Discussion: Through the implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the IS/MND, potentially significant traffic impacts resulting from the construction of the Proposed Project would be reduced to a less -than -significant level through proper construction sequencing, maintenance of two-way traffic, where possible, during construction, and measures to avoid the creation of traffic hazards. Based on these findings, the Proposed Project would not result in any residual significant and unavoidable impacts to traffic. IS/MND Mitigation Measures: • Mitigation Measure TRA -1: Prepare and Implement Traffic Control Plan • Mitigation Measure TRA -2: Return Roads to Pre -construction Condition Project Change Discussion: The proposed changes to the Proposed would have the same impact on traffic and transportation as the Original Proposed Project. The addition of new booster pump station would not result in any new impacts to traffic or transportation as was evaluated in the IS/MND. Also, the construction activities associated with the new booster pump station would be substantially the same as they were originally described in the IS/MND. The Revised Proposed Project therefore would not have any incrementally significant effects on traffic and transportation as defined in CEQA Guideline section 15162(a). IS/MND I April 2018 3-15