My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
051518
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2018 5:42:37 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 9:54:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/15/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton Recycled Water Project <br />CEQA Addendum <br />(2) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown <br />in the IS/MND; or <br />(3) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact <br />be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, <br />but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or that <br />(4) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those <br />analyzed in the IS/MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the <br />environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or <br />alternative. <br />If the answer to any of the above questions (C) through (E) for the incremental impacts of the <br />project change is `Yes,' then the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental IS/MND or an EIR <br />could be required. However, if the additional analysis completed as part of this Addendum finds <br />that the applicable conclusions of the IS/MND remain the same and no new significant impacts <br />are identified, or identified environmental impacts are not found to be more severe, or additional <br />"considerably different" mitigation unacceptable to the proponent is not necessary, then the <br />question would be answered 'No' and no supplemental or subsequent IS/MND or EIR is required. <br />(E) Are Prior Mitigation Measures Sufficient for Addressing Any New Potential <br />Changes or Impacts <br />This column indicates whether the prior environmental documents provide mitigation measures to <br />address effects in the related impact category. In some cases, the mitigation measures have <br />already been implemented. A "yes" response will be provided in either instance. If "NA" is <br />indicated, this Addendum concludes that the impact does not occur with this project change and <br />therefore no mitigation measures are needed. <br />(F) Discussion and Mitigation Section <br />IS/MND Discussion <br />A discussion of the relevant portions of the IS/MND is provided under each environmental <br />category in order to clarify the answers. The discussion provides information about the <br />IS/MND's treatment of the particular environmental issue and the status of any mitigation <br />measure that the IS/MND required or that has already been implemented. <br />IS/MND Mitigation Measures <br />Applicable mitigation measures from the IS/MND that apply to the project are listed under each <br />environmental category. <br />Project Change Discussion <br />A discussion of the environmental impacts, if any, of the new booster pump station under the <br />standards established by CEQA Guidelines section 15162(a) for each environmental resources <br />section or category. <br />April 2018 <br />3-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.