My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
051518
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2018 5:42:37 PM
Creation date
5/10/2018 9:54:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/15/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton Recycled Water Project <br />CEQA Addendum <br />Chapter 3 Environmental Analysis <br />This chapter evaluates the potential for the proposed addition of a booster pump station to have new <br />significant impacts on the environment that were not previously addressed in the IS/MND, substantially <br />more severe environmental impacts than were addressed in the IS/MND or trigger the new information <br />standards stated in CEQA Guideline section 15162. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the <br />categories in terms of any "changed condition" (i.e. changed circumstances, project changes, or new <br />information of substantial importance) that may result in a changed environmental result. A <br />determination that no such changed condition exists does not necessarily mean that the overall project <br />will have no potential impacts in an environmental category, but that the change to the Project will result <br />in a reduction or no change in the condition or status of the impact since it was analyzed and addressed <br />with mitigations in the IS/MND. <br />3.1 Explanation of Environmental Review Process <br />Table 1 evaluates any potential environmental impacts from the construction and operation of the new <br />booster pump station with the environmental impacts of the original Proposed Project as discussed in the <br />IS/MND. This comparative analysis has the following elements, which are the basis for the discussion in <br />Table 1 below: <br />(A) Were the Impact(s) were Analyzed in the IS/MND? <br />This column provides a cross-reference to the pages of the IS/MND where information and <br />analysis may be found relative to the environmental issue listed under each topic. <br />(B) What were the Environmental Impact Conclusions in the IS/MND? <br />This column provides a summary of the original environmental impact conclusions for <br />implementing the Proposed Project in the IS/MND. <br />(C) Do Proposed Changes Involve New Significant Impacts or Substantially More <br />Severe Impacts? <br />Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether the new <br />booster pump station that are part of the proposed project change will result in new significant <br />impacts that have not already been considered and mitigated by the IS/MND or a substantial <br />increase in the severity of a previously identified significant impact. <br />(D) Any New Circumstances Involving New Significant Impacts or Substantially More <br />Severe Impacts? <br />Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether there <br />have been changes to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which have <br />occurred subsequent to the City's adoption of the IS/MND that would result in the addition of a <br />new booster pump station having new significant environmental impacts that were not considered <br />in the IS/MND or that substantially increase the severity of a previously identified significant <br />impact. <br />(E) Any New Information Requiring New Analysis or Verification? <br />Pursuant to Section 15162(a)(3)(A-D) of the CEQA Guidelines, this column indicates whether <br />new information of substantial importance which was not known and could not have been known <br />with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the City adopted the IS/MND is available <br />requiring an update to the analysis of the IS/MND because the new information shows that: <br />(1) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the IS/MND; or <br />April 2018 3-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.