My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
050118
>
17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2018 12:56:47 PM
Creation date
4/26/2018 11:34:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton Development Impact Fee Nexus Study <br /> Draft Report 04/23/18 <br /> Cost Allocation <br /> The parks and recreational facility improvements allocated to new development are based on <br /> maintaining the same level of service for new development as is currently provided to existing <br /> service population. Because all parks and recreation facilities would serve both the existing <br /> service population and the future service population, only a portion of total costs are allocated to <br /> the nexus fee. The portion of the cost allocated to new development is based on growth in the <br /> City's service population relative to the City's future service population, estimated at 17 percent <br /> (see Table 3). <br /> Total parks and recreational facilities cost amounts to $276.1 million. As shown on Table 12, <br /> the cost allocated to new development and included in the fee program is $47.5 million. <br /> Table 12 Parks and Recreational Facilities Cost <br /> Item Total Source <br /> Total Cost(1) $276,147,600 Table 8 <br /> New Development <br /> Share Allocation (2) 17% Table 3 <br /> New Development Share (rounded) $47,472,800 <br /> Existing Development <br /> Share Allocation (2) 83% Table 3 <br /> Existing Development Share (rounded) $228,674,800 <br /> (1) Reflects an unfunded City obligation over the next 20-year period; rounded. <br /> (2) Based on the allocation between new and existing development at buildout;this analysis assumes <br /> that all new park space will equally serve new and existing city residents and employees.As a result, <br /> the costs are allocated based on existing and new development shares. <br /> Development impact fees cannot be used to fund the share of cost attributed to existing development. <br /> Economic& Planning Systems, Inc. 15 P:\151000s\151111PIeasantonFee\Reporg151111_FeeNexus_042318.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.