Laserfiche WebLink
Senate Bill 827, proposed earlier this year by Senator Scott Wiener, would impose <br /> statewide standards for the height, density, and required parking for new residential <br /> projects close to public transportation; thereby limiting local jurisdiction's authority over <br /> these aspects, and ability to reject such proposals. The bill has the potential to allow <br /> private for-profit housing developers to take advantage of relaxed standards for <br /> housing, which could conflict with the City's General Plan and other land use regulations <br /> and guidelines, and substantially reduce the City's ability to regulate new housing <br /> development. Cities could still regulate the design of projects and establish their own <br /> zoning standards for properties close to transit, but those standards would not be <br /> allowed to conflict with the minimum standards established under the State law. <br /> In bill amended on April 9, 2018, projects within a half-mile of a major transit stop <br /> (BART and ACE Train stations) - or within one-quarter-mile of a "high quality bus <br /> corridor" (LAVTA Bus Route 10 - Stanley Boulevard/Santa Rita Road/Owens Drive <br /> BART Station) - could rise three to four stories tall (between 45 and 55 feet), and <br /> developers would no longer be required to build parking if within a quarter mile from a <br /> major transit stop and only 0.5 parking spaces per unit for projects if further than this <br /> distance. The recent amendments also added new affordability requirements requiring <br /> below market rate units be included in all projects. <br /> Although the proposal would support high density housing production and provide <br /> much-needed housing opportunities, SB 827 has drawn significant attention from local <br /> cities, housing advocates and others, with concerns about issues such as compatibility <br /> of very dense and tall buildings with adjacent land uses, loss of local control, impacts to <br /> transportation, schools and public services; uncertainty in outcomes when, for example, <br /> non-fixed transit lines shift over time; and unintended consequences such as <br /> displacement of existing residents. <br /> Working with other Tri-Valley cities Pleasanton submitted a formal letter to oppose SB <br /> 827unless amended, articulating local concerns. The Tri-Valley Mayors also met with <br /> Senator Wiener to recommend amendments and discuss concerns. As of April 17, <br /> 2018 SB 827 failed to advance out of the Transportation and Housing Committee. The <br /> bill was granted reconsideration by the committee in its current form, however it is <br /> unlikely that it will be brought back this legislative session. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> There continues to be significant interest at the State level in addressing the statewide <br /> housing issue, SB 827 is an example, and there is a high likelihood that additional <br /> legislation will be forthcoming. Staff continues to monitor future legislative changes. <br /> Staff anticipates starting discussions and holding informational public outreach <br /> regarding the next housing element and RHNA cycle in the 2020/2021 timeframe, <br /> during which this (and any other changes to housing law) will be discussed. <br /> Page 5 of 6 <br />