My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
042318
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2018 10:53:26 AM
Creation date
4/19/2018 10:53:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/23/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SB 166 requires local jurisdictions to demonstrate similar findings for developments not <br /> only based on total numbers, but also if a project is approved for different income <br /> categories than shown in the adopted Housing Element site inventory. This would <br /> mainly impact high density sites. This means when a high density residential project on <br /> an inventory site is presented, and the applicant does not provide the number or <br /> percentage of affordable units in the income categories identified for that site in the <br /> Housing Element, a new replacement site (or sites) will have to be rezoned for high <br /> density residential within 180 days of the inventory site approval, to maintain the <br /> possibility of meeting the specified number of units at various income levels. <br /> As part of the next RHNA cycle, staff will consider and present options to Council on <br /> how to address this issue. In the meantime, SB166 is applicable to changes made to <br /> sites previously identified within the adopted housing site inventory that obtain <br /> entitlements after January 1, 2018. There is a low likelihood that any of the remaining <br /> high-density housing sites will be redeveloped in the near future. This pause in <br /> entitlement proposals allows the City time to consider how best to proceed when an <br /> application comes forward. If there is development interest in the remaining high density <br /> housing sites, the City will work with the State (HCD) to ensure the legislative <br /> requirements are being navigated in a prudent manner. <br /> AB 1397 (Inventory of Land for Residential Development) <br /> AB 1397 specifies that housing elements can only identify "potential sites" to <br /> accommodate new housing if that land has a realistic capacity to accommodate new <br /> housing development, and takes a more stringent approach to what is considered <br /> "realistic" in terms of development potential. <br /> Staff believes this bill is unlikely to have immediate impacts on current City processes <br /> and procedures. However, it may have a significant impact on the site inventory that will <br /> be prepared for the next housing element in 2023, particularly because the bill <br /> specifically prohibits use of housing sites in the new inventory if they have been <br /> included in the City's inventory for two cycles and have not been developed with <br /> housing. In Pleasanton, this would potentially eliminate several sites from inclusion in <br /> the next Housing Element opportunity site list, including the previously mentioned <br /> remaining high density housing sites; and therefore require additional sites to be <br /> identified. <br /> Other Housing Package Bills <br /> The remaining 13 bills, which are summarized in Attachment 2, do not appear to create <br /> significant policy or procedural issues for the City. They include bills related to funding <br /> for housing projects; additional (voluntary) opportunities to provide streamlined review <br /> for housing projects; standards for review for denial of housing projects; and a fix to <br /> address restrictions on designation of affordable rental housing units. <br /> Future Legislation <br /> As the State continues to navigate through the future housing challenges and <br /> opportunities, there will continue to be further discussion and pending legislation. <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.