Laserfiche WebLink
This bill allows cities, at their option, to create Workforce Housing Opportunity Zones, or <br /> areas within the city or county that are designated for expedited housing development, <br /> with at least half of the homes required to be affordable to households with low or <br /> moderate incomes. Jurisdictions that opt in to this program would be eligible to apply for <br /> State grants or zero-interest loans to cover the costs of completing the needed planning <br /> and environmental review processes. <br /> AB 73 (Housing Sustainability Districts) <br /> This bill allows cities and counties to create Housing Sustainability Districts, which <br /> function similarly to SB 540's housing zones. Housing and Sustainability Districts <br /> require at least 20 percent of the homes required to be affordable and would allow <br /> streamlined environmental and planning review. Jurisdictions that opt-in to this program <br /> would be eligible to apply for State grants or other financial incentives. <br /> AB 1515 (Reasonable Person Standard) <br /> This bill provides a "reasonable person standard" when a developer legally challenges a <br /> local jurisdiction's decision to reject a proposed housing project. It requires courts to <br /> give less deference to evidence presented by local governments, and more <br /> consideration of alternative reasonable evidence that would allow a reasonable person <br /> to reach that conclusion. This bill is primarily of concern as it relates to SB 35 and <br /> determining compliance of a proposed project with adopted City development standards <br /> and design guidelines. It emphasizes the need for those standards and guidelines to be <br /> clear, objective, and easily interpreted by all. <br /> AB 1505 (The Palmer Fix) <br /> This bill is known as the "the Palmer Fix." Since the Court of Appeals 2009 decision in <br /> Palmer/Sixth Street Properties v. City of Los Angeles, most local agencies have not <br /> been able to require affordable housing in rental projects. This bill provides <br /> authorization for these requirements, so long as an alternate means of compliance, <br /> such as in lieu fees, is also provided. The restrictions imposed by the Palmer case has <br /> not been an issue for Pleasanton as the City has been able to satisfactorily negotiate <br /> affordable components of all proposed rental projects. <br /> AB 1521 (Enhanced Preservation Notice Law) <br /> This bill strengthens the existing Preservation Notice Law by requiring sellers of a <br /> subsidized housing development to accept an offer from a qualified buyer if specified <br /> requirements are met. This law also provides HCD with additional tracking and <br /> enforcement responsibilities. This bill could assist the City in maintaining affordable <br /> units at such time as below market rent restrictions are about to expire on older <br /> affordable housing projects. <br /> AB 571 (Farmworker Housing) <br /> This bill allows individual farmworker housing projects to qualify for more public funding <br /> and allows projects with 50 percent of units for farmworkers (instead of 100 percent) to <br /> qualify, making these types of projects more financially viable. This is not likely to occur <br /> in Pleasanton. <br />