Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> Other Housing Package Bills <br /> The remaining bills described below do not appear to create significant policy or <br /> procedural issues for the City. <br /> SB 167/AB 678 (Housing Accountability Act) <br /> SB 167 and the identical AB 678 increase the burden of proof required for a local <br /> government to reject or require downsizing of a housing project that includes affordable <br /> units. These bills also require written documentation to justify decisions to reject this <br /> type of housing project, and impose fines on jurisdictions that improperly reject or <br /> require downsizing of housing projects or fail to comply with required timelines for <br /> making approval decisions. The City has not rejected any multifamily housing projects in <br /> recent history, and the minimum and maximum density requirements on the majority of <br /> the existing housing inventory sites have also prevented the reduction in density from <br /> being an issue. Staff does not anticipate the requirements of SB167/AB 678 will be an <br /> issue for the City, provided properties are approved at densities that are within the <br /> range(s) specified by the applicable zoning. <br /> AB 879 (Annual Reporting & Fees) <br /> This bill adds more technical requirements to provide additional data for required annual <br /> reports, which document the City's actual housing production each year, starting with <br /> the Annual Progress Report due April 1, 2019. It also directs HCD to evaluate the <br /> reasonableness of local government fees by June 30, 2019. These requirements will <br /> likely necessitate additional staff time to comply with the new requirements. <br /> AB 72 (Compliance Review by HCD) <br /> This bill authorizes HCD to find a city out of compliance with State housing law at any <br /> time, instead of the current practice where compliance is determined in conjunction with <br /> Housing Element certification by HCD; and to refer violations of State housing law to the <br /> Attorney General if deemed to be inconsistent with the City's adopted housing element. <br /> This bill is primarily of concern as it relates to SB 166 above, since the City could be <br /> found to be out of compliance if it were determined that adequate sites were not <br /> available based on project approvals during the current Housing Element period. <br /> SB 2 (Building Homes and Jobs Act— Recordation Fee) <br /> This bill provides funding for affordable housing by imposing a $75 fee on each <br /> recorded document up to a maximum of$225 per transaction per parcel (payable by the <br /> property owner). These fees are not a concern. <br /> SB 3 (Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2018) <br /> This bill places a bond on the November 2018 ballot. The bond measure would raise <br /> $3 billion for existing state affordable housing programs and $1 billion for CalVet, the <br /> home purchase assistance program for veterans. If the bond passes, it would provide <br /> significantly more resources for developers (most likely non-profit organizations) to build <br /> affordable permanent or transitional housing for veterans and others in the state, and <br /> possibly in Pleasanton. <br /> SB 540 (Workforce Housing Opportunity Zone) <br />