01 - Laserfiche WebLink

been developed into housing. In this RHNA cycle there is no direct implication and in the next RHNA cycle sites included for two cycles that have not been developed can no longer be used. Councilmember Pentin asserted that may be challenged State-wide, by other cities. Director of Community Development Beaudin reported staff will be reaching out on this topic and noted these sites have not been in the City's inventory for two cycles. Director of Community Development Beaudin reviewed the other pieces of legislation in the Housing Package related to Financing, Preservation, Inclusionary Zoning, Streamlining and Increased Accountability. He addressed bills being discussed including SB 827 and SB 828 and presented next steps for the City. Mayor Thorne stated SB 827 is where the City could catch up the east side because of its proximity to the Route 10 bus line and Director of Community Development Beaudin agreed. Staff will continue to follow it in terms of its implication for Pleasanton. Councilmember Pentin noted it is the high-quality transit corridors that go a quarter mile and there are high-quality transit corridors throughout Pleasanton. In response to Councilmember Narum's question regarding the Palmer fix, Director of Community Development Beaudin reported the lawsuit limited the City's ability to require inclusionary on rental housing project. Because Pleasanton has a PUD process and an inclusionary requirement, the City was able to negotiate with developers throughout the term of the Palmer fix. It no longer exists and Pleasanton will benefit in terms of moving forward with inclusionary, outside of the PUD process. It allows cities to use inclusionary for rental properties. Councilmember Olson referenced the fifteen bills and noted only two deal with financing. According to the League of California Cities, SB 2 would probably raise $400 million State-wide and SB 3 is a "geo" bond and asked whether is requires a simple majority or two-thirds. Director of Community Development Beaudin reported it is on the November 2018 ballot and requires two- thirds of a majority. Councilmember Olson stated he would not be surprised if California voters did not vote for it, especially in light of how they view housing in their backyard. He did not think the Legislature did enough to provide financing to help cities. Councilmember Pentin reported SB 3 includes $1 billion for veteran housing. He agreed with Councilmember Olson in terms of the Legislature not doing enough for financing. Councilmember Brown stated there are no comments regarding how the additional housing is tied to transit and asked regarding increasing school fees to help additional students that could come through the new housing. Director of Community Development Beaudin commented on additional demands for utilities and City services and the way the legislation is currently set up, they are not taking those issues into consideration. It will be part of the City's advocacy work going forward, in taking on new legislation. Mayor Thorne commented on the importance of elected officials advocating for some of the issues. Councilmember Brown commented on the importance of taking those additional demands into conisderation with the addition of housing. Councilmember Olson asked regarding AB 73 and asked whether it would work in Pleasanton. City Council Minutes Page 6 of 7 February 20. 2018