My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2018
>
020618
>
09A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2018 5:19:12 PM
Creation date
1/31/2018 3:10:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/6/2018
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
accessing A-1 bond money which they will know about at the end of February. It is a $7 million <br />request from the County and it would utilize the City's restricted fund for those funds. <br />Chair Nagler asked if the project as proposed meet the requirements for those bonds. <br />Ms. Houghton replied yes, that they've submitted a number of documents as part of the <br />approval process and the County has demonstrated support of the project. <br />Commissioner Brown asked if the 29 units would be market rate. <br />Ms. Houghton said the single -occupancy units are 20 percent and the dual -occupancy are <br />60 percent AMI as they envision two individuals splitting the rent. The details will be locked in <br />as they apply for financing. <br />Kurt Fehlberg, Dahlin Group Architects, reiterated the comments on the partnership between <br />SAHA and Sunflower Hill and offered to answer questions. <br />Commissioner Allen expressed gratitude for the architectural revisions made to the plans. She <br />commented on the visuals presented in the plans and identified areas which seem "flat" or <br />could use additional architectural elements, and compared this to Kottinger Gardens which are <br />a good example of high quality visuals. She referred to various plan sheet elevations and <br />asked Mr. Fehlberg to explain how those areas could be made more interesting. <br />Chair Nagler reiterated Commissioner Allen's comment and noted the landscape around <br />Kottinger Gardens really adds relief and interest to the design of the buildings. He was struck <br />in the workshop and in the revised plans and referred to Page A.3.1. He said the expanse of <br />wall to the left of the corner, the lawn seems to come up to the building and there is no visual <br />separation between those two such that the wall is not hidden or broken up. As a result, the <br />building takes on an expansiveness that is not as interesting as the look at Kottinger Gardens. <br />Mr. Fehlberg replied, commenting on the maturity of landscape at Kottinger Gardens and the <br />potential for the proposed landscape plan over time. <br />Ms. Hagen clarified, stating the planned shrubs and groundcover are not shown in the <br />rendering provided, but she clarified there will be substantial shrubs adjacent to the building as <br />well as flowers and grass areas. <br />Mr. Beaudin explained there is not a detailed planting plan at this time and if this is something <br />supported by the Commission as the project moves forward a condition could be added to <br />address concerns. <br />Commissioner Allen acknowledged the potential for landscaping to address her concerns and <br />asked the applicant if any other ideas or options were considered to enhance the plan further, <br />such as arbors or vines. <br />Mr. Fehlberg explained they are working with the unit layout to create some economies of <br />scale from an economics point of view which play into the design of the building and beyond <br />this. They believe the building has a lot of break-up and articulation that fits the residential <br />DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 24, 2018 Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.