Laserfiche WebLink
was approximately 65% higher than the architect's estimate. There is $1.2 million in the <br />FY 2017-18 CIP for this project ($940,000 Tess than the low bid). <br />Bid Analysis <br />Staff and the respective consultant architects for each project analyzed the bids as well <br />as the plans and specifications to determine why the bids received were so much higher <br />than the estimated costs. Staff also looked at other cities to determine if they were <br />experiencing similar results when bidding projects. We found that generally for "heavy <br />construction" (roadwork, bridges, underground pipelines, etc.), bids were coming in <br />close to the estimated costs. But we also found that generally for "vertical construction" <br />(buildings), bids were coming in higher than expected. While there is no way to know <br />with certainty why this is occurring, it is theorized that it is due to the amount of building <br />projects that are under construction in the current economy. Simply stated, there is a lot <br />of work available to contractors which reduces competitive pricing. It is also theorized <br />that the wildfires that occurred late last year, and the significant work associated with <br />rebuilding structures destroyed by those wildfires, may also be contributing to the <br />decrease in competitive pricing of vertical construction. In addition, the plans and <br />specifications for these two projects that dictated the work be scheduled and <br />accomplished to mitigate the impacts the construction would have on the use of the <br />facilities. The plans and specifications were very prescriptive on how the work must be <br />accomplished by the successful bidder. For example, the work in the locker rooms was <br />specified to start almost immediately and to be phased so that there would be showers <br />available to pool patrons at all times so the pools could remain open. While well <br />intentioned, these prescriptive measures were not considered adequately in the cost <br />estimates for the projects. <br />Proposed Actions <br />While both projects are very important, staff believes the DBAC project to be a higher <br />priority compared to the SFH project, primarily due to the number of code related issues <br />that the DBAC project will address compared to the SFH project. Staff intends to re - <br />advertise the DBAC project as soon as possible, with the goal of allowing work to start <br />at the end of summer 2018, immediately after Labor Day. We will have a six week bid <br />period and will use that time to solicit as much interest in the project as possible. In <br />addition, staff also believes that if we bid now for work to occur in the fall, bids may be <br />better if a contractor is "lining up" their future work. We will also look at allowing the <br />contractor full control of the project site during construction, giving them a specified <br />length of construction, but not dictating their exact schedule to the degree of the <br />previous documents. This may mean that Aquatic Center will be closed while the <br />necessary shower and locker room facilities are under construction. <br />The following is an outline of the proposed schedule for the DBAC project: <br />Re -advertise for Construction Bid <br />Bid Opening <br />City Council Award of Construction Contract <br />Start of Construction <br />End of Construction <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />March 12, 2018 <br />April 25, 2018 <br />May 15, 2018 <br />October 2018 <br />February 2019 <br />