My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-2010-11, ALAMEDA COUNTY SURPLUS PROPERTY AUTHORITY
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC-2010-11, ALAMEDA COUNTY SURPLUS PROPERTY AUTHORITY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/28/2017 4:14:42 PM
Creation date
12/28/2017 4:07:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/26/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2010-11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
No Project Alternative (No Build) <br />Description <br />The existing Project Area would remain as it currently exists. None of the project <br />components (i.e., auto mall, senior continuing care community, commercial center, <br />community park, and neighborhood park/detention basin) would be constructed. With <br />the No Project Alternative, the existing Project Area would remain undeveloped, thereby <br />failing to satisfy the project objective to develop the site with economically beneficial <br />land uses. It is unlikely that the Project Area would remain undeveloped far into the <br />future, since development of the area has already been approved as part of the 1989 <br />Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan; however, in the short term for the purposes of this <br />alternative, the area would remain unbuilt. <br />Finding: Infeasible <br />By preventing development of the Project Area, the No Project Alternative would avoid <br />or substantially reduce the significant and unavoidable impacts of the approved project <br />to aesthetics and visual quality, air quality, noise and traffic. <br />This alternative is infeasible, however, because it is inconsistent with the City's planning <br />goals. A no build alternative would fail to make responsible use of a site that has been <br />planned by the City for urban uses for 20 years. It would not comply with the direction <br />of Pleasanton's General Plan for urban uses of the project site and would fail to <br />substantially implement a Specific Plan that has already been approved by the City. <br />The No Project Alternative is also infeasible because it is inconsistent with the <br />objectives of either the proposed project or the preferred project, both of which include, <br />among others, guiding the development of the Staples Ranch site with a mix of <br />economically beneficial uses, retaining existing auto sales businesses within the City, <br />providing senior continuing care amenities, and providing community recreational <br />facilities. <br />Existing Specific Plan Alternative <br />Description <br />Under the Existing Specific Plan Alternative, the land uses that were approved as part <br />of the 1989 Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan (1989 Specific Plan) for the Project Area <br />would be developed. Of the 124 acres that comprise the Staples Ranch site, 1.5 acres <br />that lie within the City of Pleasanton would remain zoned as PUD -Medium Density <br />Residential, but this area would be developed with a portion of the community park. No <br />residential units would be constructed under this alternative. The remaining 122.5 acres <br />of undeveloped land in unincorporated Alameda County would be annexed into the City. <br />The land use designations for this area, according to the 1989 Specific Plan, include <br />Service Commercial and Light Industrial, Retail and Service Commercial, and <br />Community Park. <br />Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.