PC-2010-11, ALAMEDA COUNTY SURPLUS PROPERTY AUTHORITY

26. Conflicts with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation Finding. The City finds that the following mitigation measures are feasible and have been incorporated into the MMRP, thereby mitigating the impact to a less -than -significant level: • Provide acceptable bicycle and pedestrian access, per MM TR -9.1. • Provide adequate bus and paratransit access, per MM TR -9.2 Draft SEIR, p. 88, DEIR, p. 3.9-43 27. Potential to result in an increase in construction traffic that could impact existing Pleasanton neighborhoods Finding. The City finds that the following mitigation measure is feasible and has been incorporated into the MMRP, thereby mitigating the impact to a less -than- significant level: Develop a construction access plan to be reviewed and approved by the City's Engineering Department, per MM TR -12.1. Draft SEIR, p. 89, DER, p. 3.9-46 28. Potential to exceed standards established by the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways Finding. The preferred project would result in significant conflicts with the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency standards. (Note that during the time that Stoneridge Drive is striped for one lane of traffic in,each direction, there is no conflict with these standards; the conflicts arise only when Stoneridge Drive is striped for two lanes of traffic in each direction.) The City finds that the following mitigation measures are feasible and have been incorporated into the MMRP; however, even with implementation, the impact would remain significant and unavoidable. A statement of overriding considerations for this impact is made in the following section: Payment of regional Tri -Valley Transportation Development Fees, per MM S -TR -4.1. Draft SEIR, pp. 84-86 31 Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations