PC-2010-01, PCUP-260, SCOTT MURPHY

Resolution No. PC -2010-01 Page Two The subject property is surrounded by similar businesses and uses. The proposed business would not generate any unusual demands on the existing parking for the subject site or the surrounding properties. In addition, the applicant is required to mitigate nuisances that may occur as a result of their proposed operations. For the reasons stated above, this first finding can be made. 2. The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. The use would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The applicant is required to receive all Building and Safety Division permits for the proposed, and any future, tenant improvements. All storage would be located inside the building, and construction activities are not proposed and, therefore, would not take place outside of the tenant suite. Also, as proposed, an adequate number of parking spaces would be provided on-site. For these reasons, this second finding can be made. 3. The proposed conditional use will comply with each of the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Chapter 18.124 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code states that because of their unusual characteristics, conditional uses require special consideration so that they may"be located properly with respect to their effects on surrounding properties. They PUD zoning of the subject building permits the establishment of "industries engaged in the construction and building trades" subject to conditional use permit approval. The recommended conditions of approval will help to integrate the proposed use.without detrimentally affecting the surrounding properties and the City in general. As with any use permit, this use can be suspended or revoked if the conditions are not met. For the reasons stated above, this third finding can be made. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed concrete floor contracting business would be compatible with the existing uses in the area.