My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC-99-68
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
PC-99-68
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2006 9:32:56 AM
Creation date
12/22/2003 11:01:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/22/1999
DOCUMENT NO
PC-99-68
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-99-05
NOTES
SUMMERHILL HOMES
NOTES 3
SUBD 31 LOTS W/2 EXISTING HOMES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-99-68 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF <br />SUMMERHILL HOMES FOR PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL, AS FILED <br />UNDER CASE PUD-99-05 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, SummerHill Homes has applied for PUD development plan approval to allow the <br />subdivision ofa 15.2:!: acre site (2 existing parcels) into 31 lots ranging in size from <br />approximately 11,387 square feet to 7,787 square feet, with an approximately 1.8- <br />acre remainder site with two existing homes located at 1015, 1027, and 1500 Rose <br />A venue; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-MDR - (Planned Unit Development-Medium <br />Density Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br />welfare. <br /> <br />The proposed project, as conditioned, would be consistent with all applicable City <br />standards concerning public health, safety, and welfare. The applicant will <br />contribute to master planned infrastructure improvements that are needed in order <br />to ensure adequate circulation, water, sewer, and other infrastructure in <br />accordance with General Plan standards. <br /> <br />2. The plan is consistent with the City's General Plan. <br /> <br />While the project is within the acceptable range for PUD-MDR (Medium Density <br />Residential) projects of 2-8 units/acre, limitations in water, sewer, access, and storm <br />drain infrastructure improvements create the need to develop the area at the lower <br />end of the General Plan range. Developing the property at the lower end of the <br />density range will preserve the rural character of the area. The project at 2.93 <br />dwelling units/acre is at the lower end of the General Plan range, thus the 31-lot <br />proposal is consistent with the City's policy direction expressed at the time the <br />Medium Density Residential General Plan designation was adopted. The project <br />has been required to contribute to the necessary infrastructure improvements to meet <br />General Plan standards. <br /> <br />3. The plan is compatible with previously developed properties in the vicinity <br />and the natural topographical features of the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.