SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL - Laserfiche WebLink

I would suggest you continue this item. I was not sent a notice card for this item in spite of an email I have from Jerry Thorne years ago indicating that he would ensure the city noticed me on items involving Measure PP. For example, the drawing (not really a map) of the Oak Grove property does not reconcile with the ridgeline mappingthat the city performed in the early 1990s Kottinger Hills property and the early 20OOs Oak Grove property. I do have the maps for this property for each project, and expected to find these in the staff report. In those cases, the main ridge highlighted was "Kottinger Ridge" and marked as that in the 1990s Kottinger Hills EIR and I am unsure if Nelson has provided this to the new Community Development director or not. Needless to say, they are missing. I would expect that the packet would reconcile previously identified ridgelines with the final map. The staff report also did not indicate that Slope was defined in the 1996 General Plan in the Glossary to the Land Use Element, but that Nelson and Brian Dolan deleted all definitions when the City Council adopted the General Plan in the summer of 2009. The Slope that was defined in the 1996 General Plan was in force in the November 2008 election for Measure PP in the Land Use Element definition section prior to the city manager/city planning director deleting all definitions in the General Plan. In addition, the HPD definitions for Ridge and Ridgeline adopted in 1975 by the City Council were those definitions in place during the adoption of Measure PP by the voters in November 2008. Also missing is any reference or map or study from the Ridgelands Multijurisdictional Open Space study or the Federal Ridgelands Area Study that was prepared for Congress and the President of the United States in PL. 95-625. Also missing is any reference to U.S. Geological Survey maps of the area. Also missing is any reference to the State of California maps of the area and the Alquist Priolo zones that involve the Verona Fault running underneath the Spotorno Property that restricts and prohibits construction. It used to be that one city council member could continue an item. I would request that if staff does not continue it on its own, that a member of the city council member should continue the item for a future date. Thank you, Anne Fox 2