Laserfiche WebLink
SAVE PLEASANTON'S HILLS & HOUSING City's population. <br /> CAP INITIATIVE MEASURE PP Definition of Housing Unit <br /> The Measure would reduce the City's discretion to <br /> PPMEASURE PP: Shall the YES determine what is a housing unit and the Measure's defin- <br /> Save Pleasanton's Hills and ition could result in units within assisted living and similar <br /> Housing Cap Citizens' lnitia- NO facilities counting towards the Housing Cap, thereby <br /> tive be adopted? reducing the opportunity for other types of housing <br /> units—single family residences, apartment units, etc.—to <br /> be built. That would also likely reduce some development <br /> CITY ATTORNEY IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS OF impact fees the City and other public agencies receive and <br /> MEASURE PP reduce the City's annual net revenues. <br /> Save Pleasanton's Hills& Housing Cap Initiative If voters approve this Measure PP and Measure QQ, <br /> but Measure QQ receives more votes, no portion of this <br /> A general plan is a set of long-range goals,policies and Measure goes into effect. <br /> programs guiding land use decisions. City decisions <br /> regarding development of property within Pleasanton are If this Measure goes into effect, the policies may only <br /> currently governed by the 1996 General Plan. be amended by Pleasanton voters. <br /> This Measure would add a new policy to the General August 8,2008 <br /> Plan to prohibit placing housing units and structures, and s/MICHAEL H. ROUSH,City Attorney <br /> prohibit grading to construct residential or commercial City of Pleasanton <br /> structures, on properties with slopes greater than 25% or <br /> within 100 vertical feet of a ridgeline. Housing develop- <br /> ments of 10 or fewer units on a legal parcel are exempt <br /> from this policy. <br /> The General Plan currently provides that the City is to <br /> maintain a "Housing Cap" of 29,000 housing units. The <br /> General Plan does not provide a definition of "housing <br /> unit"but the City's past practice has been to count towards <br /> the Housing Cap each single family residence,condomini- <br /> um, mobile home, and apartment unit, but not to count <br /> second units or units in assisted living facilities.This Mea- <br /> sure would add a new policy to define a housing unit to <br /> include any residence having a kitchen and a bathroom <br /> and that no waivers be granted to exclude housing units <br /> coming within the definition. (Second units, however, are <br /> excluded by State law.) <br /> Hillside Regulations <br /> Some clarification of terms in the Measure (e.g., <br /> "structure", "ridgeline", how to measure "slope") may be <br /> necessary in order that General Plan policies remain inter- <br /> nally consistent and to resolve potential conflicts between <br /> other City policies and the Measure. Some sentences(e.g., <br /> "[S]ub-dividing a 'legal parcel'...to approve more than 10 <br /> housing units is not allowed.")are subject to various inter- <br /> pretations. <br /> The Measure's restrictions as to hillside development <br /> may result in fewer residences being built in hillside areas. <br /> It is expected, however, these units would be built in other <br /> areas of the City, although such units would likely be <br /> smaller in size. Due to the units' smaller size, some devel- <br /> opment impact fees the City and other public agencies <br /> receive are projected to be less than if larger hillside resi- <br /> dences were built. The City's annual net revenues would <br /> also likely be reduced. <br /> if hillside housing is not built, but residents built else- <br /> where in the City,such development would likely be high- <br /> er density, multiple family dwellings or smaller single <br /> family homes, which would help Pleasanton attain its <br /> share of regional housing needs for all segments of the <br /> PLPP-1 <br />