My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 17976
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
RES 17976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2017 9:31:19 AM
Creation date
11/13/2017 4:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
17976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
required, as described in ESA's.Draft SEIR/Final SEIR Recirculation Memo, dated June 5, 2017 <br /> (this memo is included as part of the City's record of proceedings for the proposed Zone, as listed <br /> above under I.D). Consistent with this review,the City finds that although changes have been <br /> made to the Draft SEIR,the Final SEIR does not contain significant new information as defined <br /> in the CEQA Guidelines and additional recirculation of the SEIR is not required. <br /> F. Certification of the SEIR <br /> In accordance with CEQA Guidelines §15090(a)(1),the City Council, as lead <br /> agency, finds and certifies that the SEIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA and the <br /> CEQA Guidelines. The City Council further finds and certifies that it has reviewed and <br /> considered the information in the SEIR prior to adopting or approving any element of or <br /> entitlement for the proposed Zone and that the Final SEIR reflects the City Council's independent <br /> judgment. Similarly,the City Council finds that it has reviewed the record of proceedings and the <br /> SEIR prior to approving any element of or entitlement for the Project. By making these findings, <br /> the City Council confirms,ratifies and adopts the findings and conclusions of the SEIR, as <br /> supplemented and modified by the findings contained herein. The SEIR and these findings <br /> represent the independent judgment and analysis of the City and the City Council. <br /> The City Council further certifies that the SEIR is adequate to support the <br /> approval/adoption of all Project components. <br /> G. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program <br /> A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, which is included in Table 6-1 <br /> of Chapter 6 of the Final SEIR, was prepared for the Project and was adopted by the City Council <br /> by the same resolution that has adopted these findings. (See Pub. Res. Code §21081.6[a][1]; <br /> CEQA Guidelines §15097.) The City will.use the MMRP to ensure and track compliance with <br /> mitigation measures. The MMRP will remain available for public review during the compliance <br /> period. <br /> H. Findings Required Under CEQA <br /> Public Resources Code §21002 provides that"public agencies should not approve <br /> projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available <br /> which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such projects[.]" <br /> Section 21002 also states that the procedures required by CEQA"are intended to assist public <br /> agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of proposed projects and the <br /> feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such <br /> significant effects." Section 21002 goes on to state that"in the event [that] specific economic, <br /> social, or other conditions make infeasible such project alternatives or such mitigation measures, <br /> individual projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof." <br /> The mandate and principles announced in Public Resources Code §21002 are <br /> implemented, in part,through the requirement that agencies must adopt findings before approving <br /> projects for which EIRs are required. (See Pub. Res. Code §21081[a]; CEQA Guidelines <br /> §15091[a].) For each significant environmental effect identified in an EIR for a proposed project, <br /> the approving agency must issue a written finding reaching one or more of three permissible <br /> conclusions. The first such finding is that"[c]hanges or alterations have been required in, or <br /> incorporated into,the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.