RES 17976 - Laserfiche WebLink

f t Council or City staff as part of the City files generated in connection with the proposed Zone. Without exception, any documents set forth above not found in the City's files for the proposed Zone fall into one of two categories. Many of them reflect prior planning or legislative decisions with which the City Council was aware in approving the Zone. (See City of Santa Cruz v. Local Agency Formation Commission [1978] 76 Cal.App.3d 381, 391-392; Dominey v. Department of Personnel Administration [1988] 205 Cal.App.3d729, 738, fn. 6.) Other documents influenced the expert advice provided to City staff or consultants, who then provided advice to the City Council. For that reason, such documents form part of the underlying factual basis for the City Council's decisions relating to the adoption of the proposed Zone. (See Pub. Res. Code, §21167.6[e][10]; Browning-Ferris Industries v. Planning Commission of City of San Jose [1986] 181 Cal.App.3d 852, 866; Stanislaus Audubon Society, Inc. v. County of Stanislaus [1995] 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 153, 155.) E. Environmental Review of the Project Pursuant to CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines,the City determined that a Supplement to the 2009 General Plan EIR and to the 2012 SEIR for the City's proposed Housing Element and Climate Action Plan should be prepared to analyze the potential environmental impact of the proposed Zone. A Notice of Preparation("NOP") describing the proposed Zone and issues to be addressed in the SEIR was distributed to responsible agencies,trustee agencies, and other state agencies through the State Clearinghouse; and to other interested parties and posted between August 27, 2014 and September 25, 2014. The Draft Supplemental EIR("Draft SEIR") was prepared and circulated for a 45- day public review period beginning September 14, 2015; the public review period was extended, ending November 23, 2015.The Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive public input on the Draft SEIR on September 23,2015. Community meetings were also held to receive public input on the Draft SEIR on October 22 and November 12, 2015. Following the close of the public review period, responses to all comments received on the Draft SEIR during the public review period were prepared, which in some cases required revisions to the Draft SEIR intended to correct, clarify, and amplify the Draft SEIR. The response to comments, changes to the Draft SEIR and additional information have been incorporated into the Final Supplemental EIR("Final SEIR"). CEQA Guidelines §15088.5 requires a lead agency to recirculate an EIR for further review and comment when significant new information is added to the EIR after public notice is given of the availability of the Draft ER but before certification.New information added to an EIR is not"significant"unless the EIR is changed in a way that deprives the public of a meaningful opportunity to comment upon a substantial adverse environmental effect of the project or a feasible way to mitigate or avoid such an effect that the project proponent declines to implement. The CEQA Guidelines provide examples of significant new information under this standard. Recirculation is not required where the new information added to the EIR merely clarifies or amplifies or makes insignificant modifications to an adequate Ea. On behalf of the City, ESA conducted a review of the Final SEIR to determine whether new information has arisen that could trigger the recirculation of the SEIR prior to the City's consideration of it for certification. This review concluded that recirculation was not 8