My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
14
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
110717
>
14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2017 11:39:33 AM
Creation date
11/1/2017 11:12:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
249
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
halt all activities within 50 feet of the discovery, and the construction contractor <br />shall notify the City. Prehistoric archaeological materials might include obsidian <br />and chert flaked -stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, scrapers) or toolmaking <br />debris; culturally darkened soil ("midden") containing heat -affected rocks, artifacts, <br />or shellfish remains; stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, handstones, or <br />milling slabs); and battered stone tools, such as hammerstones and pitted stones. <br />Historic -period materials might include stone, concrete, or adobe footings and <br />walls; filled wells or privies; and deposits of metal, glass, and/or ceramic refuse. <br />The project developer shall ensure that a Secretary of the Interior -qualified <br />archaeologist will inspect the findings within 24 hours of discovery. If the <br />archaeologist determines that construction activities could damage a historical <br />resource or a unique archaeological resource (as defined pursuant to the CEQA <br />Guidelines), mitigation will be implemented in accordance with Public Resources <br />Code (PRC) Section 21083.2 and Section 15126.4 of the CEQA Guidelines, with a <br />preference for preservation in place. Consistent with Section 15126.4(b)(3), this <br />may be accomplished through planning construction to avoid the resource; <br />incorporating the resource within open space; capping and covering the resource; or <br />deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement. If avoidance is not <br />feasible, a qualified archaeologist will prepare and implement a detailed treatment <br />plan in consultation with the City. Treatment of unique archaeological resources <br />shall follow the applicable requirements of PRC Section 21083.2. Treatment for <br />most resources would consist of (but would not be not limited to) sample <br />excavation, artifact collection, site documentation, and historical research, with the <br />aim to target the recovery of important scientific data contained in the portion(s) of <br />the significant resource to be impacted by project construction. The treatment plan <br />will include provisions for analysis of data in a regional context, reporting of results <br />within a timely manner, curation of artifacts and data at an approved facility, and <br />dissemination of reports to local and state repositories, libraries, and interested <br />professionals. <br />Site(s) affected: All sites within the proposed Zone. <br />(Draft SEIR, pp. 4.E-17 to 4.E-19.) <br />Impact 4.E -2c <br />Development facilitated by the proposed Zone may directly or indirectly destroy a <br />unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. <br />The SEIR evaluates the impacts of the proposed Zone related to the potential <br />destruction of unique paleontological resources or a unique geologic feature. <br />Significance Before Mitigation: Significant <br />Significance After Mitigation: Less than Significant <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.