14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Impact 4.A-4: The proposed Zone would not create new sources of substantial light or glare within the area of the proposed Zone which would significantly adversely affect day or nighttime views on individual project sites. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.A-25 to 4.A-26) Impact 4.A-5: The proposed Zone, in combination with other past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects would not have a cumulatively considerable adverse impact to aesthetic resources. (Draft SEIR, p. 4.A-26) 2. Air Quality Impact 4.B-5: The proposed Zone would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people from operation of uses that would be developed within the area of the proposed Zone. (Draft SEIR, p. 4.B-24) 3. Noise Impact 4.0-2: The proposed Zone would not result in significant adverse impacts from construction activities that would generate ground -borne vibration at neighboring sensitive uses. (Draft SEIR, p. 4.0-15) Impact 4.0-3: Development within the area of the proposed Zone could locate commercial or residential uses near an existing rail (BART) line. Uses that may be developed within the area of the proposed Zone would not be exposed to exterior and interior noise exposure from train noise events such that a significant impact would result. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.0-15 to 4.0-16) Impact 4.0-4: Development within the area of the proposed Zone could locate commercial or residential uses near an existing rail (BART) line. Uses that may be developed within the area of the proposed Zone would not be exposed to vibration from train pass -by events such that a significant impact would result. (Draft SEIR, p. 4.0-16) Impact 4.0-5: Development within the area of the proposed Zone would generate additional traffic on local area roadways that would increase traffic noise exposure relative to existing conditions, but not to an extent that a significant impact would occur. (Draft SEIR, p. 4.C- 17) Impact 4.0-6: New commercial land uses developed under Phase I of the proposed Zone would not be exposed to noise levels in excess of the City of Pleasanton Noise Standards. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.0-17 to 4.0-19) Impact 4.0-8: Development within the area of the proposed Zone would generate construction noise that, in combination with construction noise associated with other buildout in the City of Pleasanton, would not result in significant cumulative noise effects at noise -sensitive uses. (Draft SEIR, p. 4.0-20) Impact 4.0-9: Development within the area of the proposed Zone, in combination with other foreseen projects in the City would not produce a significant cumulative increase in traffic noise exposure. (Draft SEIR, pp. 4.0-20 to 4.0-22) 12