Laserfiche WebLink
JDEDZ PROJECT REVIEW <br />SEPTEMBER 2017 <br />CONCLUSION <br />Civic Economics was asked to conduct an expedited review of materials produced by and for <br />the City of Pleasanton analyzing the impacts of the proposed JDEDZ. Our work focused on the <br />inclusion of a Costco store because (a) it is the primary driver of sales in the project, (b) its sales <br />is the source of revenues to repay a portion of the infrastructure investment, and (c) its <br />presence is the reason for most of that infrastructure need. <br />We focused our review on three documents: an economic impact analysis prepared by ALH, a <br />staff memo entitled City Council Agenda Report dated August 29 and prepared by the <br />Community Development Planning Division, and a PDF of a PowerPoint presentation from that <br />same meeting. We also referred to Costco annual reports from 2014 and 2016 and data from <br />the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis. <br />Much to our surprise, we identified a number of problematic analyses in these reports, which <br />together lead to a substantial overstatement of the benefits and understatement of the costs of <br />the JDEDZ project. <br />I: Costco Sales Forecasts <br />Both city consultants, Century Urban and ALH, overestimate likely Costco sales based <br />on a mix of outdated data and optimistic forecasting. <br />II: Sales Tax Revenue Sharing Repayment <br />As a result, the city's anticipated ability to make planned Sales Tax Sharing payments is <br />in doubt, and its expectation of surplus sales tax revenues is inflated. <br />III: Other Funding Sources for JDEDZ <br />Of the other public funding sources for JDEDZ development, at least $6.4 million and as <br />much as $10.1 million in TIF funding is diverted from other city transportation needs. <br />IV: Impact on Pleasanton Retail Market <br />ALH understates the impact of the JDEDZ on the Pleasanton retail market by (a) <br />overestimating the size and growth of that retail market and (b) ignoring real trends in <br />the retail industry. <br />In short, the current JDEDZ proposal asks the City of Pleasanton to invest substantial public <br />funds in a costly, long-term, speculative venture in a rapidly changing industry, and to do so <br />based on erroneously optimistic forecasts of costs and benefits. City Council and the citizens of <br />Pleasanton must demand better information before making such a momentous investment. <br />Civic Economics 17 <br />P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 55 <br />