14 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. AT&T also understands that Staff at the same time also considers the WC (as well as the Fed Ex Property) to be a legal non -conforming use. To my knowledge, it is typically not possible for a land use to fall under both designations (permitted and legal non- conforming). I understand that Staff is further reviewing this matter and we look forward to receiving clarification. 5. Pursuant to the uncertainty inherent in item #4, the intent, spirit and objective of the PUD -C District is to protect existing uses, allow an "undefined" ability to expand and/or modify operations, and to continue the operation of existing uses, without compromise to their functionality. We anticipate that an interpretation of item #4, will reflect the foregoing. 6. It is our understanding, pursuant to discussions with Planning Staff, that the AT&T WC could be "reasonably" expanded or "modified", pursuant to a determination by the Planning Director, appealable to the Planning Commission. Said expansion or modification may require compliance with the new design guidelines and conditions, which are being implemented as part of the PUD -C designation. Because specific expansion and/or modification parameters are not defined, we can only surmise that a reasonable proposal would be positively received, in accord with the intent of the PUD -C District being to protect and allow existing uses to remain and operate, without compromise to their functionality (response to AT&T letter 62 in the Draft EIR). 7. It is also our understanding, that consolidation of the AT&T WC onto the rear of the existing property, as part of a future redevelopment or recycling of the property, with a use or uses permitted under the PUD -C designation on the frontage of the parcel, would be possible and deemed viable under the PUD -C designation. Such a development scenario would be intended to retain a screened version of the AT&T WC, while redeveloping the balance of the property in a manner consistent with the goals and objectives of the PUD -C. In closing, pursuant to the foregoing, AT&T remains supportive of the efforts being undertaken by the City of Pleasanton. If any of the concepts outlined herein are not valid assumptions, please contact me immediately. Please feel free to contact me directly at (925) 277-6705, or our zoning consultant, Stephen Slater at (818) 625-9013, should you have questions or desire additional information. Sin hris Chandlee CCIM, MCR Regional Manager — Transactions AT&T Services Corporate Real Estate — Western Region 'J(.!% /.'Tz-': ^r r• ,�o,-- .o... .:'4':. -1 i', ;r,; . '„'.,c ..n• �•✓ •:._., ...1 :`i1 :-:': f':^i::(: �T; n::i TI"ii��';'•'1. Pi Off:.7.V 'C", l' 2 P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ Public Comments Provided for October 11,`2017 Planning Commission Meeting 2