14 - Laserfiche WebLink

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL 41.110 `Provided to the Planning Commission After Distribution of Packet �� Date Distributed: Will ill -0 10 October 2017 Mr. Eric Luchini Associate Planner City of Pleasanton Community Development Department Planning Division P.0 Box 520 / 200 Old Bernal Avenue Pleasanton, CA 94566-0802 eluchini@cityofpleasantonca.gov RE: Commentary Pertaining to PUD -105 Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone Dear Mr. Luchini: As owner of the property situated at 7240 Johnson Drive, Pleasanton, CA (the AT&T WC), AT&T has closely followed the environmental analysis, and rezoning program initiated by the City of Pleasanton for those properties situated at 7106 thru 7315 Johnson Drive. Collectively, said properties (with others on Commerce Circle) comprise the Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone (JDEDZ) study area. It is my understanding that the Pleasanton Planning Commission will review and consider, at its regular meeting on 11 October 2017, certifying the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report, approving a General Plan Amendment to Retail/Highway/Service Commercial; Business and Professional Offices and approving a Rezoning to PUD -C, for the JDEDZ study area, inclusive of the AT&T WC. At this time, for benefit of record, I would like to articulate the understanding of AT&T, as it pertains to the foregoing action(s) to be taken by the Pleasanton Planning Commission: 1. The Planning Commission action is a recommendation, for consideration by the Pleasanton City Council at a future public hearing. A determination by the City Council is required before any action(s) become binding and effective. 2. The attached letter, submitted on 20 November 2015, remains valid and represents the current concerns and commentary of AT&T. The AT&T WC remains a vital element of AT&T's ability to render telecommunication services to the Pleasanton area. 3. Pursuant to conversations with the Planning Staff, AT&T understands that if the rezoning to PUD -C is approved, the AT&T WC, as an existing use established prior to the new PUD designation (and exceeding 5 acres), would be considered a permitted use (per the table of permitted uses, also known as Exhibit A, as attached). P14-0852 and PUD -105, JDEDZ - Public Comments Provided for October 11, 2017 Planning Commission Meeting 1