Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Allen said given the goal to create additional land uses to promote vitality and <br />tax revenue, there were some uses that seemed like they could be big and end up utilizing the <br />space that would not generate much tax revenue. She asked how they were chosen, <br />specifically massage parlors; however, these are small. The other one shown as permitted <br />versus conditional would be a theater or auditorium and potentially large sports facilities where <br />they may not get much retail revenue. These two struck her where someone could get the land <br />and the City would not be accomplishing the purpose it has. <br />Mr. Weinstein said the focus on the EDZ on Club -Retail generates quite a bit of sales tax <br />revenue, as well as hotels which generate TOT revenue. Beyond the Costco and hotel parcels <br />are parcels of varying sizes and shapes and it was felt there may be complementary uses or <br />uses that would work on the smaller parcels, hence the theater, massage parlors or sports <br />facilities. <br />Commissioner Allen questioned whether uses would be allowed or need to go through the <br />CUP process. <br />Mr. Weinstein clarified that theaters and auditoriums currently are on the uses list as permitted <br />uses, but this could be changed to require they return for a CUP. The rationale was that <br />impacts of auditoriums usually do not require specialized conditions of approval. If the <br />Commission wishes to change this it can, but right now those uses listed are permitted uses. <br />Commissioner Brown referred to the senior care/assisted living being permitted because the <br />EIR said this was not advisable given the heightened sensitivity, and he asked why this was <br />permitted. <br />Mr. Weinstein stated there is a diverse set of uses on the chart, and the specific rationale for <br />this was focused on minimizing traffic impacts of the area. Also, the EIR identifies mitigation <br />measures to address site-specific issues for senior facilities. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br />Jennifer Murillo, Costco, thanked the Commission and staff for making time for the project, <br />availed herself to questions as to their intentions and restated their commitment to the <br />community and to the project. She spoke of the area as one of the top performing in the <br />country and said it makes sense to add another warehouse in Pleasanton. <br />This Costco will add 250 new jobs with great wages and benefits, generate millions in tax <br />revenue to the City, provide funding for traffic improvements, re -purpose the industrial site <br />encouraging economic revitalization, reduce miles traveled for residents, and keep sales tax in <br />the City. She spoke of Costco's outreach and hosts to open houses and is committed to the <br />community. They intend to purchase the property and thanked the City for the opportunity to <br />expand in Pleasanton. <br />Vice Chair Nagler asked if Costco is acceptable to the fact that the warehouse could be built <br />but not begin operations until the entire traffic mitigation effort is complete. <br />Ms. Murillo said they understand the situation and said they are not going to build the building <br />and would most likely delay construction until traffic improvements are completed. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 11, 2017 Page 5 of 13 <br />