Laserfiche WebLink
Staff notes the air quality impacts listed above are primarily a function of the size of <br />the project. Although the DSEIR includes Mitigation Measures requiring dust control <br />and other construction -period pollution reduction measures, and implementation of <br />Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures, these measures would not <br />be sufficient to reduce the air emissions of the JDEDZ to a Tess -than -significant <br />level. Thus, should the City Council elect to certify the SEIR, a finding of overriding <br />considerations would need to be made for these air quality impacts (i.e., that even <br />though a project would result in one or more unavoidable adverse impacts, specific <br />economic, social or other stated benefits are sufficient to warrant project approval). <br />Significant and Unavoidable Transportation Impacts <br />The JDEDZ will generate increased traffic, affecting the levels of service for freeway <br />ramps along 1-680 and surface streets in and around the project area. It should be <br />noted that proposed transportation mitigation improvements in the DSEIR would <br />result in acceptable levels of service (i.e., duration of delay in traveling through an <br />intersection), acceptable vehicle queue spillback (i.e., backed -up traffic potentially <br />affecting operation of an upstream intersection), and acceptable freeway ramp <br />operations. However, traffic impacts are characterized as significant and <br />unavoidable because some of the needed improvements require approval by <br />Caltrans and thus are outside the immediate control of the City. The graphics below <br />(Figures 2 and 3) provide an overview of the required transportation mitigation <br />improvements resulting from the implementation of the JDEDZ. For more detailed <br />information, please refer to Chapter 4.D of the DSEIR (Attachment 2). Similar to the <br />air quality impacts described above, should the City Council elect to certify the SEIR, <br />a finding of overriding considerations would need to be made for these <br />transportation impacts. <br />Other impacts from the JDEDZ on aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural <br />resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous <br />materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population and <br />housing, public services and utilities systems, transportation and traffic, and recreation <br />would be mitigated (when appropriate) to Tess than significant levels. The mitigation <br />measures are generally typical of measures applied to development in Pleasanton, such <br />as dust control during construction; pre -construction surveys to avoid impacts on birds, <br />bats or burrowing owls; protection of waterways and riparian vegetation; archaeological <br />monitoring for archaeologically sensitive sites; Phase 1 environmental assessments <br />required to assess and remediate any hazardous materials on sites; a limitation on the <br />hours of construction; and vibration and acoustical studies to determine appropriate <br />construction techniques and sound mitigation for new buildings. <br />Page 10 of 22 <br />