My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
100317
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2017 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
9/27/2017 3:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The appeal is currently before the City Council for review and action. Please refer to <br /> Attachment 3 for a copy of this appeal. <br /> For additional background information, please refer to the July 12 and August 23, 2017 <br /> Planning Commission staff reports in Attachments 1.A and 1, and Planning Commission <br /> meeting minutes in Attachments 1.D and 2. <br /> The Planning Commission staff reports provide additional background information and a <br /> detailed discussion of the proposed application, including project compliance with the <br /> General Plan, Downtown Specific Plan, underlying zoning regulations, and other issues. <br /> The ADR process is intended to preserve and enhance the City's aesthetic values and <br /> to ensure the preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare. Additions <br /> exceeding 10 feet in height are required to obtain ADR approval. ADR applications are <br /> typically reviewed at the Zoning Administrator level. The subject proposal was heard <br /> and approved with conditions by the Zoning Administrator and was appealed to and <br /> denied by the Planning Commission. The City Council is empowered to deny the appeal <br /> (denying the project), uphold the appeal (therefore granting the appellants' requested <br /> approval of the current proposal subject to the conditions of approval listed in <br /> Attachment 1.C), or uphold the appeal and approve the project with modified conditions <br /> which differ from those listed in Attachment 1.C. Council could also direct the applicant <br /> to undertake further design revisions with staff. <br /> Site Development Standards <br /> The subject property is zoned R-1-6,500 (One-Family Residential) District. Additions to <br /> existing single-family residences are permitted in this district provided the development <br /> standards prescribed by the PMC are met. A summary of the prescribed development <br /> standards for an addition in this district and a comparison of the subject proposal to <br /> those standards are provided below: <br /> Required Existing' Proposed <br /> Setbacks <br /> Front 20 feet minimum 20 feet No change <br /> Rear 20 feet minimum 22 feet No change <br /> Side 5 feet one side/12 feet 5 feet one side/13 No change <br /> combined both sides combined both sides <br /> minimum <br /> FAR 40% maximum 26.4% 38.2% <br /> Height 30 feet maximum2 15 feet (code height); 20 20 feet (code height); 25 <br /> feet (grade to peak) feet (grade to peak) <br /> Pursuant to the approved plot plan on file with the City dated July 14, 1970. Please note these dimensions differ <br /> from the plans submitted for the project in Exhibit B; however, the discrepancies would not affect the project's <br /> compliance with the requirements of the PMC as outlined above. Staff relies upon applicants to provide accurate <br /> information; however, in many cases, applicants rely on field measurements from fence lines, interior versus exterior <br /> wall measurements, and other measurements that can change over time due to a variety of factors and could slightly <br /> affect the information provided by applicants without their knowledge.This is especially common for older properties. <br /> 2The height of a structure is measured vertically from the average elevation of the natural grade of the ground <br /> covered by the structure to the mean height between eaves and ridges for a building with a hip, gable,or gambrel <br /> roof. <br /> Page 8 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.