My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
100317
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2017 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
9/27/2017 3:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
As proposed, the project complies with the development standards prescribed by the <br /> PMC. <br /> Scope of Design Review— Criteria <br /> Chapter 18.20 (Design Review) of the PMC indicates that in order to preserve and <br /> enhance the City's aesthetic values and to ensure the preservation of the public health, <br /> safety, and general welfare, additions to single-family residences greater than 10 feet in <br /> height are subject to the ADR process. Staff notes that even though an addition may <br /> comply with the development standards of the applicable zoning district, through the <br /> design review process, the PMC allows the reviewing body to approve conditions that <br /> may be more restrictive than the normal PMC standards to ensure that the public <br /> health, safety, or general welfare is preserved. Per the Municipal Code, the reviewing <br /> body, in considering Design Review applications, is limited to focusing on the <br /> physical/design elements (and not the operational elements or expected activities within <br /> a structure) of a project. As outlined in the Design Review chapter, the reviewing body's <br /> scope of review of project plans shall include the following criteria: <br /> 1. Preservation of the natural beauty of the city and the project site's relationship to <br /> it; <br /> 2. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building to its site, including transition <br /> with streetscape, public views of the buildings, and scale of buildings within its <br /> site and adjoining buildings; <br /> 3. Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, <br /> including compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, <br /> attractive landscape transitions, and consistency with neighborhood character; <br /> 4. Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the city, and <br /> passersby through the community; <br /> 5. Landscaping designed to enhance architectural features, strengthen vistas, <br /> provide shade, and conform to established streetscape; <br /> 6. Relationship of exterior lighting to its surroundings and to the building and <br /> adjoining landscape; <br /> 7. Architectural style, as a function of its quality of design and relationship to its <br /> surroundings; the relationship of building components to one another/the <br /> building's colors and materials; and the design attention given to mechanical <br /> equipment or other utility hardware on roof, ground or buildings; <br /> 8. Integration of signs as part of the architectural concept; and <br /> 9. Architectural concept of miscellaneous structures, street furniture, public art in <br /> relationship to the site and landscape. (Ord. 1612 § 2, 1993; Ord. 1591 § 2, <br /> 1993) <br /> Page 9 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.