My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
100317
>
11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2017 4:35:21 PM
Creation date
9/27/2017 3:37:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
11
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
® Preservation of views enjoyed by residents, workers within the City, and passerby <br /> through the community. <br /> O Architectural style, as a function of its quality of design and relationship to its <br /> surroundings; the relationship of building components to one another and the building's <br /> colors and materials. <br /> The Zoning Administrator considers these design criteria in the review of all design review <br /> applications. The proposed addition would match the architectural style, colors, and materials of <br /> the existing residence. Additionally, conditions of approval were added by the Zoning <br /> Administrator to ensure that the City's aesthetic values and the public health, safety, and <br /> general welfare would be preserved. The conditions included removal of a proposed second- <br /> story window on the north-facing elevation to obstruct views from the proposed second-story <br /> into the neighbors' backyard/swimming pool area; new landscaping to improve the aesthetic <br /> appearance of the subject property and compatibility with the surrounding properties; <br /> maintenance of one parking space within the garage to reduce the number of vehicles that are <br /> parked in front of the subject property or on Yellowstone Court; and routine construction debris <br /> clean-up to ensure the project would not negatively affect the aesthetics of the neighborhood <br /> during construction. With the exception of the recommended modification below (to Condition of <br /> Approval No. 6), the Zoning Administrator and staff believe that, as conditioned, the project is <br /> consistent with the requirements and development standards prescribed by the PMC. As noted <br /> above, staff is recommending a modification to Condition of Approval No. 6 to ensure <br /> compliance with the parking standards prescribed by the PMC. The PMC requires a minimum of <br /> two parking spaces for residential uses. Only one space is required to be covered or enclosed <br /> by a carport or garage; however, the second space may not be located within the front setback <br /> area. Based on staff's review of the subject property, besides the garage, there is no other <br /> acceptable location for the second required parking space that wouldn't encroach into the front <br /> setback area. Therefore, staff is recommending that the Planning Commission modify Condition <br /> of Approval No. 6 to require, at all times, a minimum of two parking spaces (measuring 20 feet <br /> by 20 feet in area) be maintained clear and available for parking within the garage. <br /> With regard to design, the Zoning Administrator and staff believe that the project is appropriate <br /> in size and massing to be complementary to the design of the existing residence and other <br /> residences in the neighborhood. Additionally, while the PMC does not limit the number of <br /> bedrooms within a single-family residence, the Zoning Administrator and staff believe the project <br /> has been conditioned to adequately address neighborhood concerns and any impacts on the <br /> immediately adjacent neighbors within the scope of design review prescribed by the PMC. <br /> Applicant/Appellant Concerns <br /> As noted above, at the Zoning Administrator Hearing, the Johnsons, who reside at the adjacent <br /> residence to the north (3564 Yellowstone Court), expressed concerns that the proposed new <br /> second-floor windows on both the north and west-facing elevations would enable views into their <br /> backyard/swimming pool area. In response, the Zoning Administrator added Condition of <br /> Approval No. 3, which requires the applicants/appellants to remove a proposed window on the <br /> second-story of the north-facing elevation. The applicants/appellants claim this condition would <br /> require the second-story floor plan to be substantially reconfigured and prevent them from <br /> moving forward with a project that meets their needs. Additionally, the applicants/appellants <br /> state this condition should be removed because the Johnsons also have a second-story window <br /> on their south-facing elevation that provides a view into their yard. <br /> P17-0372, 3552 Yellowstone Court Planning Commission <br /> Page 8of10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.