Laserfiche WebLink
Site Development Standards <br /> The subject property is zoned R-1-6,500 (One-Family Residential) District. Additions to existing <br /> single-family residences are permitted in this district provided the development standards <br /> prescribed by the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PMC) are met. A summary of the prescribed <br /> development standards for an addition in this district and a comparison of the subject proposal <br /> to those standards are provided below: <br /> Required Existing" Proposed <br /> Setbacks <br /> Front 20 feet minimum 20 feet No change <br /> Rear 20 feet minimum 22 feet No change <br /> Side 5 feet one side/12 feet 5 feet one side/13 No change <br /> combined both sides combined both sides <br /> minimum <br /> FAR 40% maximum 26.4% 38.6% <br /> Height 30 feet maximums 15 feet(code height); 20 20 feet(code height); 25 <br /> feet(grade to peak) feet(grade to peak) <br /> As proposed, the project complies with the development standards prescribed by the PMC. <br /> Scope of Design Review— Criteria <br /> Chapter 18.20 (Design Review) of the PMC indicates that in order to preserve and enhance the <br /> City's aesthetic values and to ensure the preservation of the public health, safety, and general <br /> welfare, additions to single-family residences greater than 10 feet in height are subject to the <br /> ADR process. Staff notes that even though an addition may comply with the development <br /> standards of the applicable zoning district, through the design review process, the PMC allows <br /> the reviewing body to approve conditions that may be more restrictive than the normal PMC <br /> standards to ensure that the public health, safety, or general welfare is preserved. As outlined <br /> in the Design Review Chapter, the Zoning Administrator's or Planning Commission's scope of <br /> review of project plans shall include the following criteria: <br /> • Preservation of the natural beauty of the city and the project site's relationship to it. <br /> • Appropriate relationship of the proposed building to its site, including transition with <br /> streetscape, public views of the buildings, and scale of the buildings within its site and <br /> adjoining buildings. <br /> • Appropriate relationship of the proposed building and its site to adjoining areas, including <br /> compatibility of architectural styles, harmony in adjoining buildings, attractive landscape <br /> transitions, and consistency with neighborhood character. <br /> ° Pursuant to the approved plot plan on file with the City dated July 14, 1970. Please note these dimensions differ <br /> from the plans submitted for the project in Exhibit B; however, the discrepancies would not affect the project's <br /> compliance with the requirements of the PMC as outlined above. Staff relies upon applicants to provide accurate <br /> information; however, in many cases, applicants rely on field measurements from fence lines, interior versus <br /> exterior wall measurements, and other measurements that can change over time due to a variety of factors and <br /> could slightly affect the information provided by applicants without their knowledge. This is especially common for <br /> older properties. <br /> 5The height of a structure is measured vertically from the average elevation of the natural grade of the ground <br /> covered by the structure to the highest point of the structure or to the coping of a flat roof, to the deck line of a <br /> mansard roof, or to the mean height between eaves and ridges for a hip, gable, or gambrel roof. <br /> P17-0372, 3552 Yellowstone Court Planning Commission <br /> Page 7 of 10 <br />