My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
090517
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2017 1:10:48 PM
Creation date
8/30/2017 1:02:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/5/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Thorne asked regarding how a landlord would be able to verify the need for a tenant to smoke <br /> medical marijuana and Ms. Seto stated it would be up to the tenant to provide proof from his/her <br /> medical doctor. <br /> In response to Councilmember Pentin's question regarding whether a medical marijuana card would <br /> suffice as proof, Ms. Seto reported the card would not be enough proof as it does not explain the <br /> situation the City is proposing the ordinance include. <br /> Mayor Thorne questioned whether the City would be liable if it were to go with Option 3 Ms. Seto <br /> reported it would not, as the state has yet adopted specific language for accommodations. <br /> Ms. Seto reported all the options provided are legally defendable now. <br /> Councilmember Pentin noted the issue is not the use of medical marijuana, but rather people suffering <br /> from second-hand smoke. <br /> Mayor Thorne stated that when people take medication, it normally doesn't affect anyone else. <br /> However, in this case, it does affect other people. <br /> Councilmember Olson stated that part of City Council's responsibility includes drawing a line and <br /> suggested approving Option 3. He noted under federal law, the landlord can be held liable. <br /> Councilmember Brown noted marijuana use is not legal, on the federal level and said it is reasonable to <br /> choose Option 3, which would be consistent with the federal government. <br /> Councilmember Pentin report the state does not always adhere to federal law and expressed concerns <br /> that people who legitimately are helped using marijuana, will be negatively affected. In reply to his <br /> question, Ms. Seto reported there have been no studies in terms of what diseases can be helped by <br /> ingesting and/or smoking marijuana. <br /> Discussion followed regarding the amendment process subsequent to the state passing conflicting <br /> legislation. <br /> Councilmember Narum spoke in support of Option 2. <br /> Councilmember Pentin spoke in support of a six-month to a one-year period to see what the state <br /> decides and in support of Option 2. <br /> Councilmembers Brown and Olson spoke in support of Option 2. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Pentin/Narum to approve Option 2, introduce and waive first of Ordinance No. <br /> 2164 adding to the Municipal Code a new Chapter 9.26 restrictions on smoking in multifamily rental <br /> apartments and adopting a unifying amendment to §9.24.060. Motion passed by the following vote: <br /> Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Narum, Olson, Pentin, Mayor Thorne <br /> Noes: None <br /> Absent: None <br /> MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL <br /> Mayor Thorne reported when the state congress is back in session, it will consider many housing bills <br /> that have the potential of eliminating local control. He encouraged residents to contact state legislators <br /> to voice their concerns. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 5 of 6 August 15,2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.