My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121416
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 121416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:57:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/14/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
so that at no time could a decision of this body be invalidated by my sitting for the <br />decision or putting my vote in. So I just caution you when going on this route that there <br />could be personal reasons as well that you should probably consider fully. <br />Commissioner Allen: You are absolutely correct, and so all I want to do is understand <br />what we learn and based on that, if there would be a perception issue, I certainly would <br />take that into effect, as I've done on other task forces before. <br />Commissioner Balch: Personally, I'm fine with rolling the dice and letting the time roll <br />and trying to give you that time. I'll be honest —I would not sit in the seat until it is fully <br />resolved. <br />Commissioner Allen: Absolutely, I would not. <br />Commissioner Nagler: To that point is exactly why I wanted to do it tonight and on the <br />record and not discuss it with you ahead of time so it is not as if you're trying to <br />somehow operate to exactly to this point. Just because I obviously have an interest in <br />the matter, if I could be part of the conversation on how the questions will be asked of <br />the FPPC before they're submitted to the FPPC, I'd really appreciate that. <br />Seto: I typically work with the official that's involved so if I send the drafts to Nancy, if <br />she's comfortable sending them to you, that would be fine. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Perfect. <br />Chair Ritter: So with that said, we'll defer a decision. It sounds like we'll continue it until <br />January 11th. It's always worth knowing all the facts, and what I want to know is making <br />sure we can hear from other public citizens at the meeting. We still should be able to <br />listen to our downtown business people. <br />Seto: And like I said, the rules are different depending on what your financial interest is. <br />Chair Ritter: So I want that clarified. <br />Seto: So we're actually preparing a memo for the Planning Commission, the Council, <br />the Economic Vitality Committee and everyone who might be involved to see what that <br />level of involvement can be. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Perfect. Thank you very much. <br />9. ADJOURNMENT <br />Chair Ritter: Okay, my last word is I had a report sent to me that shows all the things we <br />accomplished in 2016 and it's kind of remarkable. We had 37 items. There were roughly <br />10 PUDs, 9 CUPs, 6 design reviews, 4 Vesting Tentative Maps, 3 work sessions, code <br />update work session, amendment to the Municipal Code, one General Plan <br />Amendment, one Specific Plan amendment, one rezoning, and one policy review <br />procedural change. We've done a lot. I am honored to be on this Commission with such <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 48 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.