My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121416
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 121416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:57:43 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:50:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/14/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Bonn: Your read of what it says is correct. A C -C zoned property less than 60,000 <br />square feet would be a permitted use. So to address your comment specifically related <br />to downtown there's probably limited spaces that are 60,000 or more square feet. If <br />somebody were to demolish an existing shopping center and start brand new, that <br />would also require design review and something like a brand new building downtown <br />would come to the Planning Commission. <br />Commissioner Allen: So today it comes to us and what we do is we say, was it <br />permitted or not? We'd look here and say, oh yeah, it's permitted. So then it makes it <br />more difficult for us to say, no you can't be here. You know, I mean it begs the <br />question. Today, we don't have any limit, right? Correct? <br />Bonn: Correct, there's no square footage threshold. <br />Commissioner Allen: So therefore if Safeway came in, we're sort of given all kinds of <br />flexibility. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: If it moves to the civic center... <br />Commissioner Balch: If it becomes a neighborhood grocery store. <br />Commissioner Allen: Yeah, I mean there could be a lot of redevelopment in that end of <br />town so I'd hate to open ourselves up that it comes to us and we say, is it permitted or <br />not? Oh yeah, it's now permitted and it's real clear up to 60,000 feet and that just <br />doesn't seem like it makes sense. It seems like we're putting ourselves at risk. <br />Commissioner Nagler: The questions on C -C or related downtown questions are going <br />to be subject to further review by the Downtown Specific Plan Task Force, right? <br />Commissioner Allen: Therefore, I kind of say let's keep this as is or let's put on C -C and <br />make it conditional. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Let the rest be permitted and under C -C make it conditional <br />Commissioner Nagler: That makes sense, not to say we have a policy position but to. <br />Commissioner Allen .... you know, we'll let the team decide. <br />Beaudin: I think Commissioner Allen, your comment is pretty specific to downtown, so <br />the question Shweta and I were just discussing was whether we could have an <br />additional footnote that talks about retail in C -C Downtown and defers to the Downtown <br />Specific Plan in terms of uses and a size threshold, or maybe we set a size threshold in <br />a footnote on the C -C for downtown. <br />The other large C -C district in town is Rosewood Commons, so I think not bringing this <br />up to that scale is important. It's unfortunate that C -C serves Rosewood Commons and <br />the downtown and they're just different pieces and fabric in our community, so the idea <br />of footnoting C -C to pull out downtown properties and setting a retail threshold that's <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 14, 2016 Page 19 of 49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.