Laserfiche WebLink
similar questions about a comparable Starbucks location. I think that's something that <br />I'm not completely comfortable about in terms of the analysis that's been done, but in <br />terms of the queue lengths and the level of service analysis that's been done, we are <br />accepting that at this point in the project. <br />Commissioner Nagler: So the other impacts that are clear are the obvious ones —the <br />ones on Johnson Court and on Larkspur Landing Drive or whatever it's called, so on <br />either end of this development and the service levels change by at least one grade in <br />each of those streets by virtue of this development, right? <br />Weinstein: So in some of the other scenarios, the level of service changes by more than <br />one grade, but what's happening in the existing plus approved conditions is that the <br />level of service is not going beyond level of service D, so there are some cases in <br />certain intersections with the project that the level of service is moving down a grade, <br />but that's not considered a significant impact because that doesn't cause the level of <br />service to go below D. So what we're saying is our impacts only in the cumulative <br />scenario which is not only existing plus approved projects but foreseeable projects in <br />the future. Typically the cumulative condition encompasses General Plan buildout as <br />well. So if that's worsening those are the significant impacts that require mitigation. <br />Beaudin: And the mitigations when they are cumulative are what we're collecting our <br />traffic impact fee to attempt to mitigate over time. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Right, and that gets back to things like right turn only. Okay, <br />thank you. <br />Commissioner Brown: Sorry, but I have a couple of quick questions. Where's the IKEA <br />in Dublin going? <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Down on Fallon. <br />Commissioner Brown: Fallon? Okay. What was the reason for restricting the uses so <br />specifically? What was the rationale there? <br />Luchini: So actually that was a call made by the applicant and he'd be better off to <br />speak about that, but I think staff's initial recommendation that we would be comfortable <br />if they selected an applicable zoning district that already had an established list of uses <br />such as C -C or the C -F. <br />Commissioner Brown: Okay, I'll ask them. And my final question was, looking at the <br />diagram there's sort of the hairpin turn around versus going just straight out. My <br />comment is that if somebody's going to drive through its because they want to leave <br />and they don't want to park and right now the plan has the traffic from the drive -thru <br />coming back around the building back in front of all the parking and people are backing <br />out and then crossing into the lane of traffic trying to enter the drive -thru. So what I was <br />wondering was why you just didn't go directly west and come down that other driveway? <br />Luchini: There actually is a driveway there directly west.... right here. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 28, 2016 Page 18 of 32 <br />