Laserfiche WebLink
Beaudin: I think the discussion we're having right now allows us, with a PUD, to <br />potentially put some additional parameters around change of use which we might want <br />to be that specific on if that's a concern. <br />Commissioner Allen: Okay, thanks. <br />Commissioner Balch: So on page 16 of 18 on permitted uses or conditionally permitted <br />uses. I was going with what Gerry said earlier, but the C -C uses that are requested are <br />circled so "restaurants and soda fountains, not including drive -ins or take -out food <br />establishments" is being requested as a permitted use and I apologize because I see <br />that we have a drive -thru, drive -in —that is not this, right? So would that be the second <br />one underneath and therefore it's conditional but they're going back? Why isn't it circled <br />I guess is what I'm asking. Or, how do I read that? Maybe I need some help. I'm on 16 <br />of 18 at this point. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: At this point it has to be conditional. <br />Commissioner Balch: I would think so because it's not being requested as permitted so <br />it would be conditional, but the design has the drive -thru so how can you reconcile that <br />please? <br />Beaudin: So it's a fair question and I think one of the questions we have for you tonight <br />is do you support the list of uses that are included for the report. And I think in the <br />question I hear direction to make sure that we're being real clear about whether or not <br />it's a restaurant use with a drive -thru or whether it's a restaurant use without a drive -thru <br />and conditionally permitted only could be a concern. <br />Commissioner Balch: Actually, you just clarified it now that you say it that way, it <br />actually clarifies it. I'm catching up to speed I can see this right now, but the reason I <br />ask is when I read what they were asking for for the PUD, I would have expected the "c" <br />to be circled as well in that line because it said these are the uses they're asking. So I <br />didn't know they were asking for that one to be conditional. Does that make sense? <br />Beaudin: And I guess my question is, do we have a sub - category or different definition <br />for the coffee shop which took it out of the restaurant realm completely. <br />Commissioner Balch: I think you're right, but I think I'm actually trying to interpret it, if I <br />understand it correctly. I'm asking for clarification because I'm now confused. In a PUD <br />we ask for these permitted uses and then we say, these are the uses we would like <br />permitted or conditional, typically the ones I've seen, right? And then typically not listed <br />is generally considered prohibited unless you get a PUD amendment. So what I'm <br />saying to you is, I read this and I said, oh, the conditional is not circled because I <br />thought we were going down the C -C column and circling everything we wanted <br />permitted or conditional. Given that the second one was not circled, I was wondering <br />why they hadn't circled it, given.....1 apologize.... do you kind of see where I'm trying <br />to.... <br />Beaudin: C -C should be circled. I think that's the answer to your question <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 28, 2016 Page 14 of 32 <br />