Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner O'Connor: So if the appropriate time to bring this up is staff's work <br />session, when is the appropriate time to bring this up when there is not a work session? <br />Beaudin: If something is a new building downtown, you're going to see it in a work <br />session. The story pole requirement comes from the Downtown section of the code. <br />Elsewhere in the City it's not in the code as an opportunity, and that goes to the broader <br />discussion about neighborhood notice and notification and story poles and how we <br />make the community aware of what we're up to. When we started this conversation a <br />few weeks back we talked a little bit about the Council Work Plan and seeing if there's a <br />policy level interest in re- looking at some of those techniques and tools that we have <br />and frankly the regulations we have in the code, and if those are things we can get <br />traction on then we make them part of the work plan when we do that work. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: But we have asked for story poles outside of the Downtown <br />area. <br />Beaudin: It's a request at that point though. It's not a code requirement. It's not an <br />application component and most developers will comply. They understand the value, <br />and this was a conversation about the office .... the three- or four -story office <br />development. Story poles just aren't practical in that context, and so it's just context - <br />specific and we'll try and be as sensitive as we can where we think there's going to be <br />view issues or incompatibility issues or compatibility issues and we'll try and make this a <br />clearer priority in our discussions earlier with applications and with applicants. It is very <br />clear to me. The conversation tonight has been helpful and I think for downtown uses, <br />we just have to be really focused on getting complete applications for you which will <br />include this conversation with applicants even when they come in for pre - application <br />meetings. <br />Commissioner Allen: Thank you. The very last question I have because I think people <br />brought it up is that Gerry, could you clarify what - - -and I have copies here if you need it <br />or anyone else would like it —I just thought it would be important to clarify what the Muni <br />Code requirements are relative to what a legitimate story pole structure should be for a <br />developer to install to meet the City code and when it needs to be placed. <br />Beaudin: I don't have that section of the code in front of me, but.... <br />Commissioner Allen: .... I'll just give it to you. I'm just sharing it because it did come up <br />by a couple of folks about what is the legitimate story pole structure. <br />Beaudin: So we actually don't define it in the code is what it looks like in the code to me. <br />It has to depict the height and mass of the proposed house or addition and it is to meet <br />the satisfaction of the Zoning Administrator or the Planning Commission is what the <br />language in the code says. This is what you handed to me. I'm pretty sure this is the <br />most recent, up to date version of our code. What I would say is again, as part of the <br />notification process we may just want to develop some criteria around what story poles <br />are and have them part of our application packet. I think that the challenge that I have <br />there is just making sure I have the adequate staff time to do that work now. What I will <br />tell you is that they will not look like what Mike Carey did on the project. I'll name names <br />because it's very recent and I think it wasn't a story pole. It was an attempt he made to <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, September 14, 2016 Page 7 of 22 <br />