PC 083116 - Laserfiche WebLink

Beaudin: So we're thinking that it's the current definition of a bar and there's no reason we couldn't adjust the timeframe. I think what we might want to do in that case and I'm not sure a bar is a conditionally permitted use or not. Bonn: Yes. Beaudin: It is a CUP? And so you can always adjust the hours in a CUP process. Bonn: If I could just add too that the 11:00 p.m. was actually amended from 10:00 p.m. as part of the downtown hospitality guidelines so it used to actually be a threshold of 10:00 p.m. which was extended to 11:00 p.m. to encourage pedestrian activity and vitality in the downtown specifically. Commissioner Balch: This might also be hard to bring up about the light industrial that the speaker commented out and reduction or removal of it, so given I am a building owner at Quarry Lane, you know, that business park is an old one and it is under a PUD as you have wisely said. It is not in this zoning because it's just not needed. It's already got its PUD and it's already been here. But as I think about it, it does make sense, and in fact when we define it internally in my company we do define it as light industrial because that is a pretty synonymous term with what it's at versus what one would consider heavy industrial. Heavy industrial typically means you can do way more. It has heavy power in the area. Livermore has a very large, heavy industrial space near Greenville Road. You attract a different clientele from that area than you do to a multi - tenant light industrial, kind of almost mixed use, bordering on mixed use between that and other uses. I get that it might not be technically necessary yet, but we have that use. It's just hiding under a PUD umbrella in my opinion at this point. Commissioner Brown: One thing to clarify, I mean, there was light industrial as a district and the comment in the staff report is that there's nothing zoned in that district and therefore we should delete it. Yet, when you go under definitions and you look at the table, light industrial is defined and it's within the table. So I guess my question as well was..... Commissioner Nagler: It's actually in the table and we're deleting the table.... Commissioner Balch: It's on page 12. Commissioner Brown: But it was defined on 18.080.15. Commissioner Balch: It's defined, but if you look at the table.... Commissioner Brown: No, the top of the table is crossed off, LI as a district; however, if you look on page 24 under Industrial, it is defined there so LI is deleted as a district but it's still defined as a category if you're using the right terms under Industrial. Therefore, it showed up in the definitions on 18.080.015 and does that ..... I have public comments about it, but I don't know if that satisfies Mr. Hirst's concern or not. Commissioner Balch: But then the concern is that you might not like this medical office building right above it and it theoretically can't go in a light industrial area because.... it's permitted in this case obviously, but industrial G or an industrial park, right? PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 47 of 58