PC 083116 - Laserfiche WebLink

goal. How you get there is the point you're raising, but I just want to make sure it's clear that it's a laudable rule. Commissioner Brown: Why not just make it permitted? Beaudin: Because there are certainly uses that fit the laudable goal definition that Commissioner Nagler just mentioned. They become routine but they still need the clarification and they need a set of parameters that help them operate in rules that don't affect their neighbors in an adverse way. It's largely about neighbors. There are some things that are community -wide but that kind of elevates it. It's really, if you're in a business park or a business center or you're even in a residential area. Commissioner Brown: So one other question is, are there two levels of CUPs today in terms of .... do all CUPS have the same fee? Or. are there other CUPs? Beaudin: No, there's one CUP application process and you can do modifications or approvals that cost less... do you have a master fee schedule? Or do you know off the top of your head? If we were doing a modification to a CUP do we charge the full rate or is it a....? Bonn: It's usually a new cost. We usually do substantial conformance. The Director of Community Development can determine it's in substantial conformance to the CUP. The Director can also discern that it makes certain slight changes to the proposed use or if the Director deems it's substantial, then it comes to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Brown: I meant a new CUP. Beaudin: Yes, it's a fee for a CUP. If you need it, you pay the fee and you get in line with the other folks who need to come to hearing. Commissioner Brown: Thank you. Chair Ritter: Keep going Shweta, you're doing great. Bonn: I think we're getting close to the end. Right now the Administrative CUP process is unique to Chapter 9.22. It applies only to recycling facilities. These are the mailbox style, kiosk style enclosures that you may have seen in a lot of parking lots around town. This is really just for simplification purposes. Instead of having an Administrative use permit process on top of a minor CUP on top of the CUP, we're proposing to delete references in Chapter 9.22 to the Administrative CUP process and we're replacing it with another very streamlined administrative review that's called a Temporary CUP. So it's strictly just for cleanup and simplicity not to have too many CUP processes outlined in the code. Commissioner Balch: Are we eliminating the CUP process or are we just rebranding the CUP process? Beaudin: This point is a hard one. There's just too many use permit names out there. So the Administrative Use Permit has to do only with recycling facilities in our code right PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 38 of 58