PC 083116 - Laserfiche WebLink

With that, I will conclude and I'm sure a lot of the neighbors are here tonight and are anxious to get up and address the Commission. Unless you have any questions from me, I will happily sit down. Commissioner Balch: I do actually, a quick question about the facility amenity. The position is that if it's a public facility and hence, not part of the HOA, how are you handling the land? Where is title on the land? Is that going to stay in the HOA? Hardy: We have offered to dedicate that as public park space. If it's going to be a public building it should be on publicly dedicated parkland. Commissioner Balch: So basically, and to make sure I'm interpreting it correctly, it sounds like you're saying we'll build it on the parcel, landscape it, get it done and then we'll dedicate it and it's not even part of our HOA area anymore because it's into the public use. Hardy: That's correct and obviously, as a result, we're losing a lot in that process. But in order to accommodate that and to give setbacks and not impact the existing facilities within the park, we're doing it within the confines and boundaries of our project site. Commissioner Balch: Thank you for the clarification. Chair Ritter: Does Ponderosa run a HOA for any other public facilities similar to this amenity? Hardy: Many of our projects have an HOA to take care of common area maintenance responsibilities. It's standard operating procedure where Ponderosa will stay on that board until such time as the majority of the homes are sold to new homeowners and then they take on the majority position on the board and then Ponderosa is no longer part of that HOA other than perhaps providing some guidance and assistance as they continue in their setup and may need some assistance in that regard. But once it is turned over to the private HOA, we are out. Commissioner Brown: Is anyone from the church planning to speak? Hardy: The pastor is here tonight, and I'm sure if you have specific questions of him, he'll be happy to answer that. Commissioner Brown: I have a question which would best be addressed by the owner. Hardy: And one other quick thing I wanted to point out to staff —the plan that you referenced that showed some parking on an additional lot within the project site, I believe you're referring to a study we prepared internally to show you the merits or lack thereof of having this be a public facility that would be accessed by the streets in our project site. Naturally, we would be concerned if a parking impact occurred to our new homeowners as well as the surrounding, existing neighbors we have. Chair Ritter: Great, any other questions? Okay, thanks. We'll invite up our first speaker. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 31, 2016 Page 11 of 58