My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081016
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 081016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:47:05 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:36:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/10/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Hagen said in the City's General Plan there were general numbers set for desiresd <br />school district capacity. Based on PUSD's demographic study all three schools that <br />would accommodate Irby students are currently operating below capacity. At the fall of <br />2020 they may increase in enrollment, but in the fall 2025, those schools will actually <br />decrease in enrollment, according to the PUSD report. In all of the years up until that <br />time they will remain below capacity. <br />Mr. Weinstein clarified that the City is relying on the school district for these numbers <br />and he noted that the City meets with the district's demographers every year and staff <br />supplies them with a list of foreseeable projects in Pleasanton. The last list from 2015 <br />which resulted in the report did include Irby among other projects in the pipeline. <br />Therefore, the numbers take into account student population growth from the Irby <br />project in conjunction with other projects, as well. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked when numbers were updated from the district. <br />Mr. Weinstein said the study was published last spring. <br />Commissioner O'Connor asked if staff was intending to change these numbers in the <br />General Plan. <br />Mr. Beaudin said the City's General Plan cannot regulate PUSD standards. PUSD <br />presented information to the Council in June 2015 and the City would not revise the <br />General Plan to adjust that number. The next time a comprehensive review is <br />undertaken. staff will confer with PUSD and confirm those numbers. <br />Commissioner Brown also questioned sizing. He referred to the number of 700 families <br />mentioned and in other times 700 individuals. The other concern he has is that he loves <br />the concept of Sunflower Hill but it seems as if it is not big enough. When he looks at <br />19 and the enthusiasm in the room from speakers, 19 will get consumed very, very <br />quickly and asked if this community is one of many other communities Sunflower Hill will <br />build or he asked if the Planning Commission should be waiting for a larger piece of <br />property. <br />Ms. Houghton said if there is land, they will come and if the Commission knows of any <br />land they are interested, but this is the only site they know of in Pleasanton. There was <br />a period of time when they began looking when they thought this site would not work for <br />them, they sought other possibilities and it did not occur. In Livermore, there will be 45 <br />units but it is different because it is a closed community. The advantage here is that <br />there will be families which can add to the Sunflower Hill community by purchasing a <br />home. This is what is unique here. <br />Commissioner Brown noted tonight the Commission is being asked to approve the <br />development for Irby Ranch, but not Sunflower Hill, and he said there is still an <br />opportunity for determining how they can get more units. <br />Lastly, Commissioner Brown said when he and Ms. Houghton talked on Friday and they <br />talked about an agreement around right of first refusal for the surrounding property. As a <br />Planning Commissioner he is trying to weigh the community benefits against the <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 10, 2016 Page 20 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.