My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 081016
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 081016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:47:05 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:36:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/10/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Chair Ritter asked Mr. Beaudin to recap some of the questions and answers, and <br />thereafter, the Commission will discuss the matter. <br />Mr. Beaudin summarized the following comments and questions brought up: <br />• Lighting in the pedestrian realm; <br />• Preserving the Zia house as the preferred alternative; <br />• Connecting a sidewalk for Lots 14, 15 and 16 in the plan; and <br />• Further refinement to Model C3 architecture <br />Commissioner Allen said at the workshop they discussed how the pool and Community <br />Center within the Sunflower Hills community could be accessed by the broader special <br />needs community. She understood this is changed and the new non - profit developer <br />wants the pool at the Community Center used exclusively by Irby Ranch residents and <br />not be available to the broader community. She asked if this is the current direction. <br />Mr. Beaudin said the Sunflower Hill PUD would be a separate application at a future <br />date. There have been discussions about the kinds of amenities on site and how large <br />they are, the number of people served, number of units, and this will be part of the PUD <br />discussion. <br />Susan Houghton, President of the Board of Directors for Sunflower Hill, said at the last <br />workshop they discussed the size of the Community Center at 5,000 square feet. They <br />were planning for the myriad of individuals who might purchase the homes and their <br />idea to come over and use the campus afterwards. Even though they have 19 units on <br />site, they anticipate 20 individuals who may be buying some of the homes and who <br />would want to access the site. <br />One of the challenges with financing is what size is the Community Center and because <br />it is not tied directly to the residence, they want to be sure they can get financing for it. <br />As Mr. Beaudin said, this is influx. It could be anywhere from 2,000 square feet to <br />5,000 square feet depending on the final size of their site. They will have to decide how <br />many homes they will be able to accommodate on site to plan for that. <br />Regarding the use of the pool and Community Center by others, they are open to the <br />idea, but nothing has yet been fleshed out. <br />Commissioner Brown said not necessarily represented here were the speakers not <br />highly in favor of Sunflower Hills, but also emails the Commission received and he <br />asked for discussion regarding this point. He noted the General Plan specifies that <br />elementary schools should not be over 600 and they are. There was also mention there <br />were 1600 portables in schools today. <br />He had asked prior to the meeting for an idea of which schools would be impacted by <br />this project and they include: Alisal Elementary, Harvest Park Middle School and <br />Amador Valley High School. He asked if these schools were at or above capacity today <br />and he asked if this development would likely put them over capacity. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, August 10, 2016 Page 19 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.