Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Balch: As long as you quality control it. <br />Chair Ritter: Yeah, so that's the challenge. I don't know if there's such a site we could <br />do that at. You use Google Earth for things. Can't you render things onto that? <br />Commissioner Balch: I'm interested because as I think about today, the first item didn't <br />have really good renderings. In fact, it was only their rendering but it wasn't imposed on <br />the site. And the second one had really good renderings and imposed on the site. So <br />it's an interesting thing between applicants. <br />Chair Ritter: So I guess this is more of a note to staff of a concern than an agenda item, <br />right? <br />Beaudin: So we're doing a few things on the other side of the wall over there. We have <br />a new Permit Center Manager who showed up about two and a half weeks ago and I <br />mentioned this to Commissioner Allen. We're really looking at our internal processes <br />from pre - application, and I joke, through code enforcement. Really what I'm talking <br />about is through the final building certificate of occupancy. But really, it's legitimately <br />from start to finish in terms of our process and so planning notices, how people come <br />through our building permit process, how we deal with code enforcement cases, <br />technology, all these things are on this person's work plan and working collaboratively <br />with other managers and staff throughout our department. So if you all can be a little bit <br />patient, I think we're going to come back to you all with some informational updates. <br />Commissioner Balch: The other thing I'll just mention as a comment is that I noticed the <br />conditions because I read them probably finer tooth as time goes on, but the conditions <br />do change between similar applications and for example, the two we had on the agenda <br />tonight, similar conditions and similar items in let's say 95% of the conditions, but the <br />manner in which they're written or in the order or tone they take is inconsistent, and I'm <br />slightly puzzled by that because I would expect basically a check the box when this <br />applies and it goes over to the list type of a thing and then you have your customized <br />conditions based more on the site. And I mention that as a consideration. <br />Beaudin: I'll tell you I sat with our new Permit Center Manager two days ago and again, <br />it was Monday and we looked at the project conditions and we went through and there's <br />a redlined version of conditions of approval and we're going to work towards a master <br />conditions list so that we do a reverse engineering process for our folks. There's a big <br />long list of conditions we use on a regular basis and we'll remove the ones that aren't <br />applicable to the project and they will be consistent when you see packet after packet. <br />Like I said, it's off and running and you'll notice it and it's coming sooner than all of you <br />might think otherwise based on how quickly we've done things because we have <br />somebody dedicated to this now. I don't want to go into a ton of detail because I want <br />to work with other staff and my managers across the department, but it's something that <br />we take seriously and we're going to continue to improve, and it's from noticing to <br />conditions, I mean all aspects of our development review process. <br />Chair Ritter: Great. Good luck! <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 35 of 38 <br />