My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 071316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:45:49 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:35:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
there that was approved by a 5 -0 vote that story poles should be added to any <br />downtown projects as part of the project whenever they were needed. So they also <br />confirmed that we just need to ask for it or has it as a standard. But I wanted to find out <br />from staff what we can do to get that built in as part of our process. <br />Chair Ritter: When is it required and when is it not required? <br />Commissioner Nagler: Before you guys respond to these, let me just say to help flesh <br />this out because I appreciate the comment you're making about that particular project, <br />but then in general; that story poles are important but also have limited utilities because <br />a story pole was put up on the project on Spring Street and I don't know that that <br />communicated the mass of the building at all. <br />Commissioner Allen: You're right on <br />Commissioner Nagler: So it's an excellent point and it is to be worked out with staff, but <br />given the utility of modern computer programming and renderings, that the story pole <br />may or may not be the right thing to do. Maybe every project in the City we should <br />require a computer - generated 3 -D renderings from a half a dozen perspectives or <br />something, right? <br />Commissioner Allen: Something that shows the mass clearly <br />Chair Ritter: Exactly, what's your thought on these? <br />Beaudin: Okay, so all great points and you know, I'll start maybe from where I think the <br />start is and that is, I feel responsible for Commissioner Allen feeling like the information <br />wasn't there so it is a point taken in terms of where buildings are going to be visible from <br />and how we characterize view shed and potential view impacts and where buildings are <br />going to be seen. <br />You know, we talked in some detail about this and I think for me the idea of our <br />downtown changing is going to result in buildings that are more visible mostly because <br />the scale of things that are there, and there's a lot of one -story buildings particularly on <br />the side streets, and those single story buildings, typically what comes up around them <br />will be more than one story. And so that building that's currently under construction <br />does not have any of the exterior finishes or materials on it, so it does stick out like a <br />sore thumb right now. There is the Carey Hoddnefield project coming in behind the <br />single story structure on the corner on Peters which I think will help fill that particular <br />block in and hopefully this new building when it's got the roof material and the exterior <br />cladding, it starts to fit in with the character of the downtown. So that's specific to that <br />one example, but I think that just needs some time to fill in. <br />There's pros and cons. To Commissioner Nagler's point, I don't think I've ever seen an <br />applicant submit a rendering or a photo simulation that doesn't serve their project pretty <br />well, and so it's a great tool and I think it does help us better. I think that story poles help <br />with height. They can help you visualize where the envelope of the building's going to <br />be but the renderings really start to give you the texture, the setbacks, a better feel that <br />the massing; how it's going to be developed and refined, and so it's using all of the tools <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 33 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.