My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 071316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 071316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:45:49 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:35:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
we have learned through our process of gathering signatures is that Pleasanton <br />residents have a polarizing position and opinions about adding a Costco on Johnson <br />Drive. Many worry about the traffic and congestion a big box store has on a gas station <br />and a gas station will bring to the area, especially when there are two other stores in an <br />eight mile radius. <br />On the other side, some residents want the Costco for the convenience and shopping <br />close to home. Either way, they are looking forward to expressing their opinions through <br />their vote in November much like they will when they vote for the City Council and <br />hopefully for more than one candidate for Mayor. This ballot Initiative presents this <br />Commission with a golden opportunity to re -think the plan for the JDEDZ. We need a <br />positive gateway that reflects the true character of Pleasanton. It will provide you with a <br />clear mandate to build or not build a Costco and this is when you can make some <br />further plans about this area. Thank you for allowing me this platform for the last few <br />months. I look forward to working with you on getting the very best solution for the <br />JDEDZ and for the residents of Pleasanton. Thank you. <br />Chair Ritter: Is the meeting for the Costco discussion on the City Council agenda? <br />What's the update? <br />Beaudin: The City Council will discuss that item on July 19`h, Tuesday night <br />Noted Present: <br />Commissioner Nagler was noted present at 7:09 p.m. <br />4. REVISIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />There were no revisions to the agenda. <br />5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />Consent Calendar items are considered routine and will be enacted, approved, or <br />adopted by one motion unless a request for removal for discussion or <br />explanation is received from the Planning Commission or a member of the public <br />by submitting a speaker card for that item. <br />a. P16 -0949, William TunQpanasit <br />Application for Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a tutoring facility <br />located at 6754 Bernal Avenue, Suite 750. Zoning for the property is PUD -C <br />(Planned Unit Development — Commercial) District. <br />b. P16 -0975, Dr. James Delano <br />Application for Conditional Use Permit approval to operate a veterinary clinic <br />within the existing building located at 4487 Stoneridge Drive. Zoning for the <br />property is PUD -1 (Planned Unit Development - Industrial) District. <br />Commissioner Allen moved to make the required Conditional Use Permit findings <br />and approve Cases P16 -0949 and P16 -0975, subject to the Conditions of Approval <br />as listed in Exhibit A of the respective staff report. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 3 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.