My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 052516
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 052516
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:43:02 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:31:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/25/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
just explain what makes this a workshop? I always ask this question. Why did we have <br />to go through a workshop for the record? <br />Weinstein: So all major downtown projects involving new construction go through <br />workshops and all projects involving legislative changes throughout the city, like <br />changes in General Plan land use designation or zoning go through workshops. <br />Chair Ritter: Great, all right. <br />Commissioner Balch: I apologize, but one other quick question I wanted to bring up is, <br />has staff had a proposal to adjust resident one to a mixed use building as well? <br />Amos: In this slide? <br />Commissioner Balch: Yes. <br />Amos: So we did have conversations with the applicant about that being an alternative <br />as well. <br />Commissioner Balch: How did that go over? <br />Amos: We're presenting the project before you with one mixed use building <br />Commissioner Balch: Okay, my question to this is wouldn't this mixed use then <br />increase the parking requirement significantly? <br />Amos: It could, depending on the square footage you have on the ground floor. <br />Commissioner Balch: Presumably, you'd almost do the exact same square footage and <br />you have nine and you already had two, so you need seven more in -lieu. <br />Beaudin: There's a room on the first floor that could be a live /work situation so I think <br />this gets us back to the earlier concept that we were talking about very early in the <br />discussions where you could theoretically have someone with a home office who has <br />the ability to operate there with a pretty small footprint on the ground floor of an office <br />space. <br />Commissioner Balch: So the City allows you to be self - employed or live /work in your <br />residence, but they don't allow you to have employees in a residence, correct? <br />Beaudin: So that's true for Home Occupation, but live /work is a little bit different. We <br />don't have live /work in the Code right now. I think it's something we could certainly <br />explore for downtown when we get into the Downtown Specific Plan effort. In a PUD <br />scenario like this, we have a little bit of flexibility to play with that concept, particularly <br />because we're trying to get this project into an O district and I think, if I could just take <br />the opportunity while I have the opportunity —the idea of creating that taller plate height <br />and getting those transom windows in there, what you start to see is the possibility for a <br />space that can evolve with the neighborhood. So we're talking about it in the context of <br />an Office district but we're being mindful of the fact that when we get into this Downtown <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 25, 2016 Page 13 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.