My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 041316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:34:09 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Ritter: Are there any more questions for Mr. Townsend? Then we'll close the <br />public hearing and bring it back to staff. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I have one more. This is more of a theoretical question. As an <br />architect, as you view this neighborhood, do you understand why staff is asking for a <br />porch? <br />Townsend: Yes, like I said, we have a porch. <br />Commissioner Nagler: The point I'm trying to get at is there is no porch like this in the <br />neighborhood. The porches in the neighborhood are a much more traditional porch and <br />so I'm just asking, do you think that the request is inappropriate as an architect or do <br />you understand the reason for the porch? <br />Townsend: I understand the request and I also understand that the language is very <br />vague. It doesn't say in the guidelines anything about size, projection, engaged... It's <br />just a porch and we have a porch. We proposed a porch. The house next door —I did <br />that —that has a five -foot porch. Now we're talking 10 foot, eight foot, it's all these <br />numbers that are very vague that are being circulated. By the way, we have over <br />600 square feet of covered porch on this house already where they are going to do their <br />primary living. <br />Chair Ritter: All right, thank you. Our last speaker is Gloria Maceiko? <br />Gloria Maceiko – Neighbor: Thank you. First of all, I'm super happy to hear that the <br />family members are moving into the neighborhood. We are right behind you on Creek <br />Trail Drive. One of the main reasons we bought this house is because of the beautiful <br />view we get from our house of the Pleasanton Ridge and I didn't see any pictures that <br />project the house against the houses in the neighborhood to see what views would be <br />blocked along the surrounding homes. So that is my request. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay, thanks for your feedback. Any other comments? Okay, we'll close <br />the public hearing and bring it back to the Commission and staff. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Allen: I have a question for Gerry because he started to talk about what <br />this design might look like and I'm wondering if we could just hear your perspective <br />given this discussion about a porch and, I think you were ready to design a porch that <br />would be compatible. <br />Beaudin: I think Mr. Townsend touched on it. I'm talking about extending the gable <br />much like Commissioner Nagler was discussing, with 3 columns on the front of the <br />home. He has already established with the style of architecture the kind of porch that <br />we're talking about is not out of character. I met with these folks three months or so ago <br />and we talked about the streetscape and front yard character and we did discuss <br />porches, and we didn't require a porch at the time. We talked about that as an <br />architectural detail that's important for the neighborhood. So it's been out there. I <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 9 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.