My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 041316
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
PC 041316
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:34:09 PM
Creation date
8/11/2017 2:29:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/13/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
haven't seen the plans a lot since then, but I do think that is an appropriate architectural <br />feature for the streetscape in this area. <br />Commissioner Allen: Thank you. <br />Chair Ritter: Any more questions? This is just proposed for Lot 4. Have they presented <br />anything on Lot 2 or Lot 1? Or, it is just future zoning? <br />Weinstein: Future zoning. <br />Chair Ritter: Okay. Comments? <br />Commissioner Balch: So my initial comment is that a home that doesn't fit within the <br />neighborhood has to be looked at pretty carefully. I think it does behoove us to retain <br />the character of the neighborhood so I'm generally supportive of the idea of adding or <br />requiring a porch. I'm also trying to find a compromise because I think it is pretty heavy <br />handed for a governmental body, in my opinion, to dictate that a porch is required. I <br />have difficulty with that. I would be fine if it was even a porch that had the white picket <br />fence in front of it, that extended 12 feet across the front gable, and 5 feet out, and was <br />uncovered but had the look of a porch being there. So in that regard, I've learned to not <br />try to design from the dais, so I'd like to either continue the matter so they can design a <br />porch that would be satisfactory or I'm supportive of staff's requirement. <br />Commissioner Nagler: I very much agree with Commissioner Balch. I used to attend <br />Planning Commission meetings and watch the Planning Commission require applicants <br />to do things and I would think, how is it that the Planning Commission gets to do that? I <br />was before I understood actually and honestly the role of the Planning Commission. In <br />matters like this it seems to me that the role is to apply planning standards and <br />architectural standards in a uniform way so that the character of the City from <br />neighborhood to neighborhood is maintained. It's not really to have an opinion about <br />architecture or an opinion about paint colors, but it is relevant when we are asked to <br />ensure that the character of the community is maintained. And I've come to better <br />appreciate that that is the role of the Planning Commission. <br />That being said, I've actually, just by chance, walked in this neighborhood dozens of <br />times. It's a terrific little neighborhood. I have a dog I constantly walk and we walk <br />through this neighborhood, and long before this matter came up, it occurred to me that <br />it's a really terrific, quaint neighborhood and I've often looked at your home wondering <br />what's ever going to happen with this terrific surrounding property. And part of the <br />charm of the neighborhood is that sense that people come out of their homes into the <br />front and whether it happens or not, you get the sense that it's a neighborhood where <br />neighbors connect and that the architecture contributes to that. That's made possible in <br />fact because there are spaces in the front of the house for those connections to be <br />made. Again, whether it happens or not, I don't know, but that's certainly the character <br />of the neighborhood and just to say, you're moving into a terrific neighborhood as you <br />well know. <br />So that's obviously a long way of saying that I too concur that even with the terrific <br />design that you have and the location that you obviously are devoted to, that there is a <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 10 of 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.